Skip to content

Conversation

@thomaspoignant
Copy link
Member

This PR

Adding missing exports for GO Feature Flag Web Provider

@thomaspoignant thomaspoignant requested review from a team as code owners December 5, 2025 10:23
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @thomaspoignant, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request resolves an issue in the GO Feature Flag Web Provider by ensuring that critical components, specifically data models and error definitions, are correctly exposed. This enhancement improves the overall usability and completeness of the provider, allowing other parts of the application to seamlessly interact with its full functionality.

Highlights

  • Missing Exports Fixed: This pull request addresses a fix for the GO Feature Flag Web Provider by adding previously missing exports.
  • Module Accessibility: The model and errors modules within the go-feature-flag-web provider are now properly exported, making them accessible to consumers of the library.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request adds missing exports for the GO Feature Flag Web Provider. The export for model is correct, but the export for errors will cause a build failure because it points to a directory without an index.ts file. I've provided a critical comment with a suggested fix to address this.

I am having trouble creating individual review comments. Click here to see my feedback.

libs/providers/go-feature-flag-web/src/index.ts (3)

critical

This export will fail because './lib/errors' is a directory and does not contain an index.ts file to act as the module's entry point. To fix this, you should export each error file from the errors directory individually.

export * from './lib/errors/goff-error';
export * from './lib/errors/collector-error';
export * from './lib/errors/fetch-error';

@thomaspoignant
Copy link
Member Author

/gemini review

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly exposes the GoFeatureFlagWebProviderOptions and ExporterMetadataValue types, which are necessary for users to configure the provider. The change is straightforward and well-implemented. I've added one suggestion to use export type for better code clarity and potential build optimizations.

@thomaspoignant thomaspoignant force-pushed the fix-goff-web-missing-export branch from 1a3c2b9 to 8ccc412 Compare December 5, 2025 10:31
@thomaspoignant thomaspoignant merged commit e9e5e2b into main Dec 5, 2025
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants