Skip to content

Conversation

@tvegas1
Copy link
Contributor

@tvegas1 tvegas1 commented Oct 10, 2023

cherry-pick: #11893

At very high scale, having each rank storing each other rank's remote keys for
each segment can lead to high memory consumption.

We activate symmetric remote key option to generate remote keys that will be
deduplicated and then used interchangeably.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Vegas [email protected]

@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v5.0.0 milestone Oct 10, 2023
@tvegas1
Copy link
Contributor Author

tvegas1 commented Oct 10, 2023

@yosefe pls look, smkey v5.0.x commit

@github-actions
Copy link

Hello! The Git Commit Checker CI bot found a few problems with this PR:

722b407: oshmem: Add symmetric remote key handling code

  • check_cherry_pick: does not include a cherry pick message (did you need to bot:notacherrypick?)

Please fix these problems and, if necessary, force-push new commits back up to the PR branch. Thanks!

At very high scale, having each rank storing each other rank's remote keys for
each segment can lead to high memory consumption.

We activate symmetric remote key option to generate remote keys that will be
deduplicated and then used interchangeably.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Vegas <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 776e8ba)
@janjust janjust merged commit c799ddf into open-mpi:v5.0.x Oct 12, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants