sharedfp/sm and lockedfile: fix naming bug #5609
                
     Merged
            
            
          
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
  Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
  You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
  Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
  This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
  Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
  Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
  Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
  
    
  
    
If an application opens a file from multiple processes
using MPI_COMM_SELF (or another set of communicators that have
the same CID on distinct process groups, as can happen as the result
of comm_split), the naming chosen for the managing the shared file pointer position
in a file (in sharedfp/lockedfile) or the mmapped shared memory region
(in sharedfp/sm) component would lead to a collision between the distinct process groups.
This patch ensures that the filename is different by integrating the process id
of rank 0 for each sub-communicator.
This fixes one aspect of the problem reported in github issue #5593
This commit is the equivalent to commit 9b65ec9 on master.
It can not be cherry-picked directly due to significant changes in the overal
organization of the file.
Signed-off-by: Edgar Gabriel [email protected]