- 
                Notifications
    You must be signed in to change notification settings 
- Fork 929
v4.0.x: Oshmem multiple contexts #6509
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
v4.0.x: Oshmem multiple contexts #6509
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Tomislav Janjusic <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 79ba752)
Signed-off-by: Xin Zhao <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Tomislav Janjusic <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 289595e)
Signed-off-by: Tomislav Janjusic <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 9a06000)
… track of ucx_ctx_default's rkeys Signed-off-by: Tomislav Janjusic <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 48033ac)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The corresponding master PR (#6492) has not been merged yet.
| This looks like it might be related to #6443.  Any advice regarding both of these? | 
Signed-off-by: Tomislav Janjusic <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit e1c1ab0)
Signed-off-by: Tomislav Janjusic <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit e041400)
…s/delete oshmem_barrier in shmem_ctx_destroy ompi/oshmem/spml/ucx: optimize spml ucx progress Signed-off-by: Tomislav Janjusic <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 9c3d00b)
92babff    to
    69a80fc      
    Compare
  
    | @jsquyres corresponding cherry-picks fixed in this PR also | 
| @jsquyres please re-review (or at least dismiss your earlier change request) when you get a moment. Thanks. | 
| @gpaulsen I'm not qualified to review this one -- it's all about oshmem and UCX. I just made the one comment about superfluous commits + cherry pick hashes. That being said, the corresponding master PR hasn't been merged yet. So this PR still isn't ready. | 
| @gpaulsen sorry this PR missed the train. It can go out in 4.0.2. | 
| @jsquyres PR for master has been merged in so dismissing your review. | 
PR #6492 has been merged into master
Cherry-picked commits from #6492
This PR replaces #6443