-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
sdk/log: Add FilterProcessor and EnabledParameters #6317
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Co-authored-by: Sam Xie <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Sam Xie <[email protected]>
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go#6317 +/- ##
=====================================
Coverage 81.8% 81.8%
=====================================
Files 283 283
Lines 24892 24900 +8
=====================================
+ Hits 20378 20387 +9
+ Misses 4110 4109 -1
Partials 404 404 |
dashpole
approved these changes
Feb 14, 2025
XSAM
approved these changes
Feb 17, 2025
MrAlias
approved these changes
Feb 18, 2025
This was referenced Feb 21, 2025
Closed
XSAM
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 5, 2025
## Overview This release is the last to support [Go 1.22]. The next release will require at least [Go 1.23]. ### Added - Add `ValueFromAttribute` and `KeyValueFromAttribute` in `go.opentelemetry.io/otel/log`. (#6180) - Add `EventName` and `SetEventName` to `Record` in `go.opentelemetry.io/otel/log`. (#6187) - Add `EventName` to `RecordFactory` in `go.opentelemetry.io/otel/log/logtest`. (#6187) - `AssertRecordEqual` in `go.opentelemetry.io/otel/log/logtest` checks `Record.EventName`. (#6187) - Add `EventName` and `SetEventName` to `Record` in `go.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdk/log`. (#6193) - Add `EventName` to `RecordFactory` in `go.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdk/log/logtest`. (#6193) - Emit `Record.EventName` field in `go.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlplog/otlploggrpc`. (#6211) - Emit `Record.EventName` field in `go.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlplog/otlploghttp`. (#6211) - Emit `Record.EventName` field in `go.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/stdout/stdoutlog` (#6210) - The `go.opentelemetry.io/otel/semconv/v1.28.0` package. The package contains semantic conventions from the `v1.28.0` version of the OpenTelemetry Semantic Conventions. See the [migration documentation](./semconv/v1.28.0/MIGRATION.md) for information on how to upgrade from `go.opentelemetry.io/otel/semconv/v1.27.0`(#6236) - The `go.opentelemetry.io/otel/semconv/v1.30.0` package. The package contains semantic conventions from the `v1.30.0` version of the OpenTelemetry Semantic Conventions. See the [migration documentation](./semconv/v1.30.0/MIGRATION.md) for information on how to upgrade from `go.opentelemetry.io/otel/semconv/v1.28.0`(#6240) - Document the pitfalls of using `Resource` as a comparable type. `Resource.Equal` and `Resource.Equivalent` should be used instead. (#6272) - Support [Go 1.24]. (#6304) - Add `FilterProcessor` and `EnabledParameters` in `go.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdk/log`. It replaces `go.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdk/log/internal/x.FilterProcessor`. Compared to previous version it additionally gives the possibility to filter by resource and instrumentation scope. (#6317) ### Changed - Update `github.com/prometheus/common` to v0.62.0., which changes the `NameValidationScheme` to `NoEscaping`. This allows metrics names to keep original delimiters (e.g. `.`), rather than replacing with underscores. This is controlled by the `Content-Type` header, or can be reverted by setting `NameValidationScheme` to `LegacyValidation` in `github.com/prometheus/common/model`. (#6198) ### Fixes - Eliminate goroutine leak for the processor returned by `NewSimpleSpanProcessor` when `Shutdown` is called and the passed `ctx` is canceled and `SpanExporter.Shutdown` has not returned. (#6368) - Eliminate goroutine leak for the processor returned by `NewBatchSpanProcessor` when `ForceFlush` is called and the passed `ctx` is canceled and `SpanExporter.Export` has not returned. (#6369) [Go 1.23]: https://go.dev/doc/go1.23 [Go 1.22]: https://go.dev/doc/go1.22 --------- Co-authored-by: Robert Pająk <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Tyler Yahn <[email protected]>
jsuereth
pushed a commit
to open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specification
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 25, 2025
Fixes #4363 Towards #4208 (uses Severity Level passed via Logger.Enabled) Towards stabilization of OpenTelemetry Go Logs API and SDK. ## Use cases Below are some use cases where the new functionality can be used: 1. Bridge features like `LogLevelEnabled` in log bridge/appender implementations. This is needed for **all** (but one) currently supported log bridges in OTel Go Contrib. 2. Configure a minimum log severity level for a certain log processor. 3. Filter out log and event records when they are inside a span that has been sampled out (span is valid and has sampled flag of `false`). 4. **Efficiently** support high-performance logging destination like [Linux user_events](https://docs.kernel.org/trace/user_events.html) and [ETW (Event Tracing for Windows)](https://learn.microsoft.com/windows/win32/etw/about-event-tracing). 5. Bridge Logs API to a language-specific logging library (the other way than usual). ## Changes Add `Enabled` opt-in operation to the `LogRecordProcessor`. I created an OTEP first which was a great for having a lot of discussions and evaluations of different proposals: - #4290 Most importantly from #4290 (comment): > Among Go SIG we were evaluating a few times an alternative to provide some new "filter" abstraction which is decoupled from the "processor". However, we faced more issues than benefits going this route (some if this is described here, but there were more issues: open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go#5825 (comment) . With the current opt-in `Processor.Enabled` we faced less issues so far. > We also do not want to replicate all features from the logging libraries. If someone prefer the log4j (or other) filter design then someone can always use a bridge and use log4j for filtering. `Enabled` callback hook is the simplest design (yet very flexible) which makes it easy to implement in the SDKs. This design is inspired from the design of the two most popular Go structured logging libraries: https://pkg.go.dev/log/slog (standard library) and https://pkg.go.dev/go.uber.org/zap. > > It is worth to adding that Rust design is similar and it also has an `Enabled` hook. See #4363 (comment). Basically we want to add something like https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/trait.Log.html#tymethod.enabled to the `LogRecordProcessor` and allow users to implement `Enabled` in the way that it will meet their requirements. > > I also want to call out form https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specification/blob/main/oteps/0265-event-vision.md#open-questions: > > > How to support routing logs from the Logs API to a language-specific logging library > > To support this we would need a log record processor which bridges the Logs API calls to given logging library. For such case we would need an `Enabled` hook in `Processor` to efficiently bridge `Logger.Enabled` calls. A filterer design would not satisfy such use case. I decided to name the new operation `Enabled` as: 1. this name is already used in logging libraries in many languages: #4439 (comment) 2. it matches the name of the API call (for all trace, metrics and logs APIs). I was also considering `OnEnabled` to have the same pattern as for `Emit` and `OnEmit`. However, we already have `ForceFlush` and `Shutdown` which does not follow this pattern so I preferred to keep the simple `Enabled` name. For `OnEmit` I could also imagine `OnEmitted` (or `OnEmitting`) which does something after (or just before like we have `OnEnding` in `SpanProcessor`) `OnEmit` on all registered processors were called. Yet, I do not imagine something similar for `Enabled` as calling `Enabled` should not have any side-effects. Therefore, I decided to name it `Enabled`. I want to highlight that a processor cannot assume `Enabled` was called before `OnEmit`, because of the following reasons: 1. **Backward compatibility** – Existing processors may already perform filtering without relying on `Enabled`. For example: [Add Advanced Processing to Logs Supplementary Guidelines #4407](#4407). 2. **Self-sufficiency of `OnEmit`** – Since `Enabled` is optional, `OnEmit` should be able to handle filtering independently. A processor filtering events should do so in `OnEmit`, not just in `Enabled`. 3. **Greater flexibility** – Some processors, such as the ETW processor, don’t benefit from redundant filtering. ETW already filters out events internally, making an additional check unnecessary. 4. **Performance considerations** – Calling `Enabled` from `OnEmit` introduces overhead, as it requires converting `OnEmit` parameters to match `Enabled`'s expected input. 5. **Avoiding fragile assumptions** – Enforcing constraints that the compiler cannot validate increases the risk of introducing bugs. This feature is already implemented in OpenTelemetry Go: - open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go#6317 We have one processor in Contrib which takes advantage of this functionality: - https://pkg.go.dev/go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/processors/minsev This feautre (however with some differences) is also avaiable in OTel Rust; #4363 (comment): > OTel Rust also has this capability. Here's an example where it is leveraged to improve performance by dropping unwanted log early. https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-rust/blob/88cae2cf7d0ff54a042d281a0df20f096d18bf82/opentelemetry-appender-tracing/benches/logs.rs#L78-L85 --------- Co-authored-by: Tyler Yahn <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Sam Xie <[email protected]>
1 task
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Per #6271 (comment)
There is a little overhead (IMO totally acceptable) because of data transformation. Most importantly, there is no new heap allocation.
Logger.Enabledis still more efficient thanLogger.Emit(benchmarks from #6315).Prior art:
I also created for tracking purposes: