-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 169
Add Jackson packages grouping to Renovate configuration and fix gitignore #2237
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
breedx-splk
merged 4 commits into
main
from
copilot/fix-6b08ea7d-2690-4333-9bfd-9b597407cb28
Sep 8, 2025
Merged
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
trask marked this conversation as resolved.
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1 @@ | ||
| https://gradle.com/s/43hywguw5f3eg |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So this feels like copypasta (it's even in the docs), but maybe I'm missing something and I am willing to use this as a moment to learn.
Java doesn't use the forward slash in package names, so why does this glob include a forward slash?
My understanding of the brace expansion is that
com.fasterxml.jackson{/,}**simply expands tocom.fasterxml.jackson/** com.fasterxml.jackson**. Right?So we don't need that first one, and the second one is probably overkill. Jackson packages are just in
com.fasterxml.jacksonso I'd prefer that this just tighen up tocom.fasterxml.jackson. If there are other packages in the future that we want to add, we can do that then.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databindis incom.fasterxml.jackson.coreUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we still be explicit then and avoid the forward slash thinger?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
looking into the question about
{/,}... I'm not sure (other than it's the pattern we use elsewhere in this file)...There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yeah, from the Renovate logs, it looks like
can I make a follow-up PR to fix this since copilot did its job here based on our current pattern?