Skip to content

Conversation

@jaydeluca
Copy link
Member

Related to #7195

@jaydeluca jaydeluca marked this pull request as draft January 2, 2025 13:12
@jaydeluca jaydeluca marked this pull request as ready for review January 4, 2025 14:13
@Test
void testIgnoreHandlersBeforeOpenTelemetryServerHandler() {
assertThat(app.getHttpClient().get("ignore").getBody().getText()).isEqualTo("ignored");
assertThat(testing.spans().stream().filter(span -> "GET /ignore".equals(span.getName())))
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In the groovy test we retry until this condition becomes true, here we assume that we already have the completed spans. Mayabe here we should also use awaitility to retry to ensure this test won't be flaky or rewrite to use testing.waitAndAssertTraces that also retries.


@Test
void testIgnoreHandlersBeforeOpenTelemetryServerHandler() {
assertThat(app.getHttpClient().get("ignore").getBody().getText()).isEqualTo("ignored");
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

original groovy test uses app.test(). I think it should be fine to not use it. The difference between groovy and java version is that in groovy version app = new RatpackFunctionalTest(RatpackApp) is run for each test and the app.test calls close on the app when the test completes. In the java version app is created once for all tests and close is not called. We could close it in a @AfterAll cleanup method.

span.hasName("another-span")
.hasParent(trace.getSpan(0))
.hasAttributes(Attributes.empty())
.hasTotalRecordedEvents(1)));
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

could use hasEventsSatisfyingExactly

@trask trask merged commit 1e7f4a2 into open-telemetry:main Jan 7, 2025
58 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants