Skip to content

Conversation

@trask
Copy link
Member

@trask trask commented Oct 10, 2025

No description provided.

@trask trask marked this pull request as ready for review October 10, 2025 21:10
@trask trask requested a review from a team as a code owner October 10, 2025 21:10
@otelbot-java-instrumentation
Copy link
Contributor

🔧 The result from spotlessApply was committed to the PR branch.

@laurit
Copy link
Contributor

laurit commented Oct 11, 2025

I'm not sure about this. I like the @CsvSource because it lets you keep the test data close to the test similarly to spock. Imo it works well in a lot of cases. @MethodSource would be preferable when you need complex parameters.

@trask
Copy link
Member Author

trask commented Oct 11, 2025

Yeah, makes sense, are there any of these that you want to keep?

@zeitlinger
Copy link
Member

I agree with @laurit - could you change they query to exclude tests where the tests are all strings?

@laurit
Copy link
Contributor

laurit commented Oct 13, 2025

Yeah, makes sense, are there any of these that you want to keep?

I think I wouldn't change any of these

@trask trask closed this Oct 13, 2025
@trask trask deleted the csvsource branch October 20, 2025 16:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants