[next] merge changes from main

[pichlermarc]

Important

This PR needs to be merged by a maintainer as we need to merge it non-squashed. Otherwise we'll have to do the same work again.

Updates next with the latest changes from main, all changes here are pre-reviewed already

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 99.00000% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 94.63%. Comparing base (47212bb) to head (4179ddb).
Report is 23 commits behind head on next.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...imental/packages/opentelemetry-sdk-node/src/sdk.ts	95.74%	2 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             next    #5275      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   94.56%   94.63%   +0.06%     
==========================================
  Files         316      323       +7     
  Lines        8037     8084      +47     
  Branches     1628     1643      +15     
==========================================
+ Hits         7600     7650      +50     
+ Misses        437      434       -3     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
...l/packages/otlp-transformer/src/common/internal.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...ntal/packages/otlp-transformer/src/common/utils.ts	100.00% <ø> (ø)
...ckages/otlp-transformer/src/logs/internal-types.ts	100.00% <ø> (ø)
...tal/packages/otlp-transformer/src/logs/internal.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...l/packages/otlp-transformer/src/logs/json/index.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...al/packages/otlp-transformer/src/logs/json/logs.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...ckages/otlp-transformer/src/logs/protobuf/index.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...ackages/otlp-transformer/src/logs/protobuf/logs.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...ges/otlp-transformer/src/metrics/internal-types.ts	100.00% <ø> (ø)
.../packages/otlp-transformer/src/metrics/internal.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 14 more

... and 3 files with indirect coverage changes

[chancancode]

This probably should be updated to pull in 8ab52d5, currently any PR targeting next will fail without it. #5280 would be nice to have as well if it makes it in time for the release.

[pichlermarc]

This probably should be updated to pull in 8ab52d5, currently any PR targeting next will fail without it. #5280 would be nice to have as well if it makes it in time for the release.

Done 🙂