chore(config): generate types from config json schema

[JamieDanielson]

Which problem is this PR solving?

• Fixes Generate configuration model from schema spec #5827

Short description of the changes

Add generation script that generates types based on the otel config schema, using a tool called quicktype. These types are intended to be used in the configuration package instead of us handrolling the types.

I haven't gone through this enough yet to see how accurate it is and if it fits our needs or requires more tuning (it very likely requires more tuning).

Type of change

• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

How Has This Been Tested?

• Ran the script and confirmed generated types were created

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 95.22%. Comparing base (af28dba) to head (9e8b772).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #6001      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   95.23%   95.22%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         311      311              
  Lines        8596     8603       +7     
  Branches     1799     1801       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits         8186     8192       +6     
- Misses        410      411       +1     

see 1 file with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[maryliag]

Nice! one suggestion for checking your results: look at this latest PR I created: #6000
The majority of models are added on it, and I separated by file, like the schema, to make things easier to compare, organize, etc, so it would be good if this also generated like that

[maryliag]

There is also a file that has the description of the parameters, so you should also combine that, so we know more info, default values, etc