Skip to content

Conversation

@cijothomas
Copy link
Member

Towards #1306
This PR fixes some inconsistencies, but not all. There'll be further follow ups to make everything consistent.

@cijothomas cijothomas requested a review from a team as a code owner November 24, 2024 21:16
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 24, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 79.5%. Comparing base (129ca03) to head (36a60d3).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##            main   #2336   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage   79.5%   79.5%           
=====================================
  Files        123     123           
  Lines      21365   21365           
=====================================
  Hits       17004   17004           
  Misses      4361    4361           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

observability tools.

*Compiler support: [requires `rustc` 1.70+][msrv]*
*[Supported Rust Versions](#supported-rust-versions)*
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This section needs some changes, the MSRV varies across crates—some require Rust 1.70, while others need 1.71.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

good point! Let me address it next.

//! compiler version is 1.49, the minimum supported version will not be
//! increased past 1.46, three minor versions prior. Increasing the minimum
//! supported compiler version is not considered a semver breaking change as
//! long as doing so complies with this policy.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should this be in README.md instead of lib.rs?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

that is something I expect to resolve next. My thinking is to make everything in lib.rs and have readme just point to docs.rs/crate

infrastructure, or runtime environment. Crucially, the storage and visualization
of telemetry is intentionally left to other tools.

*[Supported Rust Versions](#supported-rust-versions)*
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit - do we need this line, given that the information is already clear and easy to find in the README?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

kept it for consistency, and also there'll be more content to be added to this readme in future.

@cijothomas cijothomas merged commit e6c351f into open-telemetry:main Nov 25, 2024
22 of 23 checks passed
@cijothomas cijothomas deleted the cijothomas/msrv-readmes branch November 25, 2024 18:40
cijothomas added a commit to cijothomas/opentelemetry-rust that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2024
pitoniak32 pushed a commit to pitoniak32/opentelemetry-rust that referenced this pull request Dec 4, 2024
bantonsson pushed a commit to bantonsson/opentelemetry-rust that referenced this pull request Oct 9, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants