Skip to content

Conversation

@cijothomas
Copy link
Member

Good boost to the enabled() check.

@cijothomas cijothomas requested a review from a team as a code owner March 18, 2025 03:02
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 18, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 79.7%. Comparing base (40effae) to head (d1bfa0f).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##            main   #2823   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage   79.7%   79.7%           
=====================================
  Files        124     124           
  Lines      23297   23297           
=====================================
  Hits       18582   18582           
  Misses      4715    4715           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

|---------------------------------------------|-------------|
| exporter_disabled_concurrent_processor | 1.9 ns |
| exporter_disabled_simple_processor | 5.0 ns |
| exporter_disabled_concurrent_processor | 1.0 ns |
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Add the inline attribute to the processor and exporter's event_enabled methods as well?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I tried that but it didn't give any boost 🤷‍♂️

@cijothomas cijothomas merged commit e43f3df into open-telemetry:main Mar 18, 2025
23 checks passed
@cijothomas cijothomas deleted the cijothomas/enabled-inline branch March 18, 2025 17:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants