Skip to content

[editorial] Remove outdated sections from Logs spec #4380

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 22, 2025
Merged

[editorial] Remove outdated sections from Logs spec #4380

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 22, 2025

Conversation

@pellared
Copy link
Member

@pellared pellared commented Jan 22, 2025 •
edited
Loading

These sections are no longer needed after this PR being merged:

One of the sections was originally created here:

@pellared pellared added editorial Editorial changes only (typos, changelog, ...). No content-related changes of any kind. spec:logs Related to the specification/logs directory labels Jan 22, 2025
@pellared pellared marked this pull request as ready for review January 22, 2025 15:17
@pellared pellared requested review from a team January 22, 2025 15:17
@pellared pellared changed the title [editorial] Remove outdated section from Logs SDK [editorial] Remove outdated sections from Logs spec Jan 22, 2025
@reyang reyang merged commit dd64573 into open-telemetry:main Jan 22, 2025
6 checks passed
@pellared pellared deleted the rem-leftover-section branch January 22, 2025 16:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@dashpole dashpole dashpole approved these changes

@cijothomas cijothomas cijothomas approved these changes

@reyang reyang reyang approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

editorial Editorial changes only (typos, changelog, ...). No content-related changes of any kind. spec:logs Related to the specification/logs directory

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@pellared @dashpole @cijothomas @reyang