test

[robertpietzcker]

• add a "supply" subcategory
• shift "electricity" under this "supply" subcategory
• add a split into "fuel cost", "investments" and "operation and maintenance cost"

[robertpietzcker]

@danielhuppmann @phackstock the checks are failing, but they are complaining about stuff that doesn't seem to be linked to my PR:

 ValueError: Collected 16 errors:
  1. Illegal character(s) ':' in source of region 'Norway|Ostland'.
  2. Illegal character(s) ':' in source of region 'Norway|Sorost'.
  3. Illegal character(s) ':' in source of region 'Norway|Hallingdal'.
  4. Illegal character(s) ':' in source of region 'Norway|Telemark'.
  5. Illegal character(s) ':' in source of region 'Norway|Sorland'.
  6. Illegal character(s) ':' in source of region 'Norway|Vestsyd'.
  7. Illegal character(s) ':' in source of region 'Norway|Vestmidt'.
  8. Illegal character(s) ':' in source of region 'Norway|Norgemidt'.
  9. Illegal character(s) ':' in source of region 'Norway|Helgeland'.
  10. Illegal character(s) ':' in source of region 'Norway|Troms'.
  11. Illegal character(s) ':' in source of region 'Norway|Finnmark'.
  12. Illegal character(s) ';' in notes of region 'Pan-Europe'.
  13. Illegal character(s) ':' in source of region 'EFTA'.
  14. Illegal character(s) ':' in source of region 'EU27 & EFTA'.
  15. Illegal character(s) ';' in note of region 'Italy|Subgrid north'.
  16. Illegal character(s) ';' in note of region 'Italy|Subgrid south'.

[danielhuppmann]

We had a regression in nomenclature - this should have been fixed with release 0.25.1, not sure why this still persists here... Will investigate.

[danielhuppmann]

Fixed via #375, please rebase.

[phackstock]

Looks good to me.

[robertpietzcker]

thanks!

[danielhuppmann]

Isn't this a duplicate of #376?

[robertpietzcker]

yes.
apologies: I don't really know my way around git, and when I tried to rebase things sort of didn't go as I wanted, so I thought I do a "rebase by hand" by simply taking the head revision AFTER Daniel's quick fix, and then adding my commit on top of that.

but then I didn't close this PR here ...

[robertpietzcker]

so I would now simply close it.
Apologies, @phackstock , for making you review this one even though Daniel had already reviewed the other one