Introduction of usageAgreement #559
Conversation
Raphael-Gazzotti
added
request
lzehl
left a comment
lzehl
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Usage Agreements are needed for in vivo human data which in principle cannot be licensed. Therefore I don't think we would like to allow for Usage Agreements for any other RP/RPV but datasets (and maybe atlases and common coordinate spaces, TBD I'm not sure).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't think UsageArgreements are needed for MetaDataModels. This is affecting in vivo human data only which in principle cannot be licensed
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't think UsageArgreements are needed for Models (TBD though; not sure about digital twins). This is affecting in vivo human data only which in principle cannot be licensed
There was a problem hiding this comment.
No idea from the team for digital twins.
Maybe @apdavison have more inputs about it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't think UsageArgreements are needed for Software. This is affecting in vivo human data only which in principle cannot be licensed
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@CPernet if you have the time I would like your feedback on the properties for a Usage Agreement.
|
Discussed with Andrew that usage agreements can apply broadly (e.g., video games that are softwares), and licenses can be considered as a subtype of usage agreements. |
Raphael-Gazzotti
force-pushed
the
dataUsageAgreement
branch
from
a95b042 to
c6fd877
Compare
2 participants
Introduce usageAgreement.schema.tpl.json, license property modified by usageCondition.