Another take to use arch when selecting repo for build target

[abitrolly]

This is another attempt to solve problem that osc build selects OpenSuse_Tumbleweed even if this selection doesn't fit the required architecture.

#241 (comment)

• trace the role of no_repo
• trace the role of repo_names
• check offline logic is not broken (check that offline still
  needed a non-empty repo list before this change)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 8 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 22.95%. Comparing base (43337af) to head (e1dcec7).
⚠️ Report is 1885 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
osc/commandline.py	0.00%	8 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1097      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   22.95%   22.95%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          27       27              
  Lines       16368    16373       +5     
==========================================
  Hits         3758     3758              
- Misses      12610    12615       +5     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[hramrach]

r.arch == arg_arch looks fishy, shouldn't there be a list somewhere?

[abitrolly]

It is a string comparison of arch that osc repos gives.

[hramrach]

So it returns the same repo multiple times with different arch

[hramrach]

Does not work for me:

localhost:~/home:michals/vertest # osc -d build
hostarch: armv7l
arg_arch: armv7l
arg_repository: None
arg_descr: None
no configured repos for arch armv7l

[abitrolly]

That was a mistake indeed. Fixed that part.

[hramrach]

Looks like this works, thanks

osc -d build
hostarch: armv7l
arg_arch: armv7l
arg_repository: None
arg_descr: None
Building vertest.spec for openSUSE_Leap_15.2_Ports/armv7l

[dmach]

This pull request has been in a draft state for quite some time.
Could you either finish it, close it or add a comment that you're still planning to work on it?

[abitrolly]

@dmach it looks like this PR improves error messages, but I don't remember what I was trying to do and if it reaches that point. Feel free to close it if it has no value.

[github-actions]

This PR is stale because it has been open 200 days with no activity.