Skip to content

Conversation

amri369
Copy link
Contributor

@amri369 amri369 commented Mar 26, 2025

Related to issue #416

Pull Request: Fact Checking Guardrails Feature

Summary

  • Added a new feature for fact checking guardrails.
  • Complements the existing input/output guardrails implementation.
  • Follows the same design patterns as the existing guardrails.

Test Plan

  • Unit tests have been added in tests/test_guardrails.py to ensure functionality.
  • Example usage provided in examples/agent_patterns/fact_checking_guardrails.py.
  • Verified that make lint and make format pass without issues.
  • Ran full test suite to ensure all tests pass.

Issue Number

Checks

  • I've added new tests (if relevant).
  • I've added/updated the relevant documentation in docs/guardrails.md.
  • I've run make lint and make format.
  • I've made sure tests pass.

@amri369 amri369 marked this pull request as draft March 27, 2025 17:42
@amri369 amri369 marked this pull request as ready for review March 27, 2025 18:05
@amri369 amri369 changed the title Feat/fact checking guardrails Fact checking guardrails Mar 27, 2025
@amri369 amri369 mentioned this pull request Apr 2, 2025
@amri369 amri369 changed the title Fact checking guardrails Fact checking guardrails (issue #416) Apr 3, 2025
@amri369 amri369 changed the title Fact checking guardrails (issue #416) Fact checking guardrails Apr 3, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

This PR is stale because it has been open for 10 days with no activity.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Apr 23, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

This PR was closed because it has been inactive for 7 days since being marked as stale.

@github-actions github-actions bot closed this Apr 30, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants