Skip to content

Conversation

@vbatts
Copy link
Member

@vbatts vbatts commented Oct 31, 2016

Signed-off-by: Vincent Batts [email protected]

@wking
Copy link
Contributor

wking commented Oct 31, 2016

On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 12:48:28PM -0700, Vincent Batts wrote:

A schema/image-layout.json (15)

I like this name, but the pattern so far has been to use *-schema.json
for these entry-point files 1. If we stick to that, this would be
image-layout-schema.json.

@jonboulle
Copy link
Contributor

agree w/wking

"properties": {
"imageLayoutVersion": {
"description": "version of the OCI image-layout",
"type": "string"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This should probably be an enum with 1.0.0 as the only option.

@vbatts vbatts force-pushed the image-layout-schema branch from cb64297 to c7ff884 Compare November 3, 2016 18:29
@vbatts
Copy link
Member Author

vbatts commented Nov 3, 2016

PTAL

@wking
Copy link
Contributor

wking commented Nov 3, 2016 via email

@jonboulle
Copy link
Contributor

is wanting rebase

@philips
Copy link
Contributor

philips commented Nov 17, 2016

@vbatts needs rebase

@vbatts vbatts force-pushed the image-layout-schema branch 2 times, most recently from 08355f8 to 2d4716f Compare November 21, 2016 18:51
@vbatts
Copy link
Member Author

vbatts commented Nov 21, 2016

updated. PTAL.

@jonboulle
Copy link
Contributor

there's no "MUST" here anymore

@vbatts
Copy link
Member Author

vbatts commented Nov 22, 2016

@jonboulle you're right!

@vbatts vbatts changed the title image-layout: a MUST and some schema image-layout: some schema Nov 22, 2016
@vbatts vbatts force-pushed the image-layout-schema branch from 2d4716f to 75db538 Compare November 22, 2016 14:44
@vbatts
Copy link
Member Author

vbatts commented Nov 22, 2016

updated. PTAL.

@jonboulle
Copy link
Contributor

jonboulle commented Nov 22, 2016

lgtm some

Approved with PullApprove

@wking
Copy link
Contributor

wking commented Nov 22, 2016 via email

@vbatts vbatts force-pushed the image-layout-schema branch from 75db538 to 616cef0 Compare November 30, 2016 21:27
@vbatts
Copy link
Member Author

vbatts commented Nov 30, 2016

ugggggh. such rebase. Why does the schema fs have to include modtime?

updated.PTAL.

@vbatts vbatts force-pushed the image-layout-schema branch from 616cef0 to b779042 Compare November 30, 2016 23:38
@vbatts
Copy link
Member Author

vbatts commented Nov 30, 2016

.. omg ...
rebased. PTAL.

@jonboulle
Copy link
Contributor

vincent

@jonboulle
Copy link
Contributor

jonboulle commented Dec 1, 2016

lgtm

Approved with PullApprove

@stevvooe
Copy link
Contributor

stevvooe commented Dec 7, 2016

LGTM

Approved with PullApprove

@jonboulle
Copy link
Contributor

@vbatts lol

Signed-off-by: Vincent Batts <[email protected]>
@vbatts vbatts force-pushed the image-layout-schema branch from b779042 to 694055e Compare December 9, 2016 14:15
@vbatts
Copy link
Member Author

vbatts commented Dec 9, 2016

🤕
rebased. PTAL

@jonboulle
Copy link
Contributor

jonboulle commented Dec 9, 2016

lgtm

Approved with PullApprove

@vbatts
Copy link
Member Author

vbatts commented Jan 11, 2017

bump

@stevvooe
Copy link
Contributor

stevvooe commented Jan 12, 2017

lgtm

Approved with PullApprove

@stevvooe stevvooe merged commit c88b4eb into opencontainers:master Jan 12, 2017
@vbatts vbatts deleted the image-layout-schema branch February 8, 2017 14:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants