features-linux: expose IntelRdt monitoring support #1290
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
marquiz
requested review from
AkihiroSuda,
crosbymichael,
cyphar,
dqminh,
giuseppe,
hqhq,
kolyshkin,
mrunalp,
thaJeztah,
tianon and
utam0k
as code owners
|
Or could/should we just rely on |
Commit 34a39b9 introduced the "linux.intelRdt.enableMonitoring" field. This patch supplements it by adding "linux.intelRdt.monitoring" field in the features.json to check if the runtime implementation supports the new field of the spec. Signed-off-by: Markus Lehtonen <[email protected]>
marquiz
force-pushed
the
devel/rdt-features-monitoring
branch
from
85d1729 to
5786013
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Commit 34a39b9 introduced the "linux.intelRdt.enableMonitoring" field. This patch supplements it by adding "linux.intelRdt.monitoring" field in the features.json to check if the runtime implementation supports the new field of the spec.
Refs: #1287