Update README.md to add link to NH law #3
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add link to NH law
Author
|
@waldoj While I did notice the "[RETIRED]" in the repo's description, I figured that as the repo is not actually archived yet, I might as well try submitting this PR anyways? |
Author
@JoeGermuska WDYT? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I recently put in a research request with my Office of Legislative Services to determine whether our RSA 21-R constituted an "Open Data Policy" as defined by this repo or not. The researcher got in touch with our Director of IT, who wrote back that he does in fact consider it to qualify as an Open Data Policy, although he also said he is not interested in cross-posting it to GitHub, so I am doing that instead for him. Note that this Director of IT has also consistently opposed my other attempts at passing FOSS-related legislation, so I'd take his determination with a grain of salt and verify that it meets the criteria yourself, but I figured I'd at least make notice of it.