Skip to content

Conversation

jstourac
Copy link
Member

@jstourac jstourac commented Aug 7, 2025

Description

How Has This Been Tested?

Merge criteria:

  • The commits are squashed in a cohesive manner and have meaningful messages.
  • Testing instructions have been added in the PR body (for PRs involving changes that are not immediately obvious).
  • The developer has manually tested the changes and verified that the changes work

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated project ownership records to reflect changes in approvers and reviewers. Some users have been moved to emeritus status.

@jstourac jstourac self-assigned this Aug 7, 2025
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 7, 2025

Walkthrough

The OWNERS file is updated to remove atheo89 and jiridanek from the approvers and reviewers lists, adding them to emeritus_approvers. Additionally, dibryant is moved from the reviewers list to emeritus_reviewers. No other changes are made.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
OWNERS File Updates
OWNERS
Removed atheo89 and jiridanek from approvers and reviewers; added them to emeritus_approvers. Added dibryant to emeritus_reviewers.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

  • add @jesuino to OWNERS #645: Both PRs modify the OWNERS file by updating the lists of approvers and reviewers, but the main PR removes users and moves them to emeritus roles while the retrieved PR adds a new user to approvers and reviewers, indicating related changes to the same file and roles management.

Suggested labels

approved, lgtm, size/xs

Suggested reviewers

  • dibryant

Note

⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!

Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 620a0f1 and 7b3f750.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • OWNERS (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • OWNERS
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from andyatmiami and jiridanek August 7, 2025 11:09
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added size/s and removed size/s labels Aug 7, 2025
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
OWNERS (1)

23-26: Keep emeritus_reviewers list alphabetically sorted.

Most blocks in this file follow alphabetical order for easier scanning. Placing dibryant after rkpattnaik780 breaks that convention.

 emeritus_reviewers:
   - rkpattnaik780
+  - dibryant
-  - dibryant
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3469006 and 620a0f1.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • OWNERS (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/kubeflow#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-17T17:36:30.551Z
Learning: Step 6 of the DEPENDENCIES.md file in opendatahub-io/kubeflow repository requires updating the Go version and UBI version in the external openshift/release repository's CI operator configuration file at ci-operator/config/opendatahub-io/kubeflow/opendatahub-io-kubeflow-master.yaml, specifically updating the build_root.image_stream_tag.tag to use the correct Go version and base_images.ubi_minimal.tag to match the UBI version changes.
Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/kubeflow#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-17T17:37:03.652Z
Learning: Step 6 in the DEPENDENCIES.md file for opendatahub-io/kubeflow refers to updating Go version in the openshift/release repository configuration files at https://github.com/openshift/release/blob/master/ci-operator/config/opendatahub-io/kubeflow/opendatahub-io-kubeflow-main.yaml and https://github.com/openshift/release/blob/master/ci-operator/config/opendatahub-io/kubeflow/opendatahub-io-kubeflow-v1.10-branch.yaml, not the local CI/CD files in the kubeflow repository.
🔇 Additional comments (1)
OWNERS (1)

18-21: Additions look correct.

atheo89 and jiridanek are now properly moved to emeritus_approvers, and there are no lingering duplicates in the active approvers/reviewers sections.

@jiridanek
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm label Aug 7, 2025
Copy link
Member

@harshad16 harshad16 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

Thank you for the awesome work team and contributions.
@jiridanek @atheo89 @dibryant

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 7, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: harshad16

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved label Aug 7, 2025
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit b84fd03 into opendatahub-io:main Aug 7, 2025
12 checks passed
@jstourac jstourac deleted the updateOwners branch August 7, 2025 14:29
AjayJagan pushed a commit to AjayJagan/kubeflow that referenced this pull request Aug 8, 2025
…95f920 (opendatahub-io#672)

Signed-off-by: konflux-internal-p02 <170854209+konflux-internal-p02[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: konflux-internal-p02[bot] <170854209+konflux-internal-p02[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants