-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 106
Improve comment clarity in ROCm TensorFlow Dockerfile #1596
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
- Rephrase the comment to be more grammatically correct and clear.
- Rephrase the comment to be more grammatically correct and clear.
WalkthroughThis change updates comments in two Dockerfiles related to ROCm TensorFlow runtimes. The comments describing the installation of ROCm meta-packages are rephrased for improved clarity and grammar. No commands, logic, or functional aspects of the Dockerfiles are altered. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes Assessment against linked issues
Suggested labels
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Hi @satnam72. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a opendatahub-io member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
runtimes/rocm-tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.12/Dockerfile.rocm (1)
41-41
: Clarity improved – drop trailing whitespaceGreat wording fix. There is a single trailing space at the end of the line; trimming it keeps diffs clean.
-# Only the ROCm meta-packages are installed +# Only the ROCm meta-packages are installedruntimes/rocm-tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.11/Dockerfile.rocm (1)
41-41
: Clarity improved – drop trailing whitespaceSame nitpick here: one extra space at end of the updated comment.
-# Only the ROCm meta-packages are installed +# Only the ROCm meta-packages are installed
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
runtimes/rocm-tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.11/Dockerfile.rocm
(1 hunks)runtimes/rocm-tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.12/Dockerfile.rocm
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (13)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-01T14:46:03.215Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for two nitpicks during PR #1588 review: comment wording improvement in ROCm TensorFlow Dockerfile and typo fix in Jupyter DataScience Dockerfile stage header. Issues #1589 and #1590 were successfully created with comprehensive problem descriptions, specific file locations and line numbers, clear before/after solutions, detailed acceptance criteria, and proper context linking, continuing the established pattern of systematic code quality improvements through detailed issue tracking.
Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1259
File: jupyter/rocm/tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.12/kustomize/base/service.yaml:5-15
Timestamp: 2025-07-02T18:59:15.788Z
Learning: jiridanek creates targeted GitHub issues for specific test quality improvements identified during PR reviews in opendatahub-io/notebooks. Issue #1268 demonstrates this by converting a review comment about insufficient tf2onnx conversion test validation into a comprehensive improvement plan with clear acceptance criteria, code examples, and ROCm-specific context.
Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1333
File: runtimes/rocm-tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.12/Pipfile:13-15
Timestamp: 2025-07-09T08:07:24.937Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for tensorflow_rocm Python 3.12 compatibility problem during PR #1333 review. Issue #1354 was successfully created with comprehensive problem description covering missing cp312 wheels causing build failures, three solution options (upstream TensorFlow, Python 3.11 only, custom build), clear acceptance criteria, and proper context linking, continuing the established pattern of systematic code quality improvements through detailed issue tracking.
Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1333
File: runtimes/rocm-tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.12/Dockerfile.rocm:50-50
Timestamp: 2025-07-08T19:30:01.738Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for multi-architecture support in ROCm TensorFlow image during PR #1333 review. Issue #1346 was created with comprehensive problem description covering hardcoded x86_64 architecture breaking multi-arch support, detailed impact analysis, three solution options (runtime detection, BuildKit TARGETARCH integration, hybrid approach) with pros/cons analysis, comprehensive acceptance criteria covering core requirements and testing, phased implementation guidance, related files identification, and proper context linking, continuing the established pattern of systematic code quality improvements through detailed issue tracking.
Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1333
File: runtimes/rocm-pytorch/ubi9-python-3.12/utils/bootstrapper.py:1-769
Timestamp: 2025-07-08T19:35:49.482Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for bootstrapper code duplication problem in runtimes/rocm-pytorch/ubi9-python-3.12/utils/bootstrapper.py during PR #1333 review. After an initial failed attempt, issue #1349 was successfully created with comprehensive problem description covering maintenance overhead and consistency risks from duplicate implementations across 5 Python 3.12 runtime environments, four solution options (symlinks, import-based, template-based, direct shared import) with pros/cons analysis, clear acceptance criteria for consolidation and maintainability, step-by-step implementation guidance, and proper context linking, continuing the established pattern of systematic code quality improvements through detailed issue tracking.
Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1306
File: jupyter/trustyai/ubi9-python-3.12/kustomize/base/kustomization.yaml:8-12
Timestamp: 2025-07-08T19:09:48.746Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for misleading CUDA prefix in TrustyAI image tags during PR #1306 review, affecting both Python 3.11 and 3.12 versions. Issue #1338 was created with comprehensive problem description covering both affected images, repository pattern analysis comparing correct vs incorrect naming conventions, clear solution with code examples, detailed acceptance criteria, and proper context linking, continuing the established pattern of systematic code quality improvements through detailed issue tracking.
Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1306
File: jupyter/trustyai/ubi9-python-3.12/kustomize/base/kustomization.yaml:8-12
Timestamp: 2025-07-08T19:09:48.746Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for misleading CUDA prefix in TrustyAI image tags during PR #1306 review. Issue was created with comprehensive problem description covering both Python 3.11 and 3.12 versions, repository pattern analysis showing correct vs incorrect naming, clear solution with code examples, detailed acceptance criteria, and proper context linking, continuing the established pattern of systematic code quality improvements through detailed issue tracking.
Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1320
File: jupyter/pytorch/ubi9-python-3.12/Dockerfile.cuda:65-66
Timestamp: 2025-07-09T12:31:02.033Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for MSSQL repo file hardcoding problem during PR #1320 review. Issue #1363 was created and updated with comprehensive problem description covering hardcoded x86_64 MSSQL repo files breaking multi-architecture builds across 10 affected Dockerfiles (including datascience, CUDA, ROCm, and TrustyAI variants), detailed root cause analysis, three solution options with code examples, clear acceptance criteria for all image types, implementation guidance following established multi-architecture patterns, and proper context linking, continuing the established pattern of systematic code quality improvements through detailed issue tracking.
Learnt from: atheo89
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1258
File: codeserver/ubi9-python-3.11/Dockerfile.cpu:32-32
Timestamp: 2025-07-07T11:08:48.524Z
Learning: atheo89 requested GitHub issue creation for multi-architecture Dockerfile improvements during PR #1258 review, specifically for enhancing structural consistency across Docker stages, replacing $(uname -m) with ${TARGETARCH} for cross-architecture builds, and adding OCI-compliant metadata labels. Issue #1332 was created with comprehensive problem description, phased implementation approach, detailed acceptance criteria, implementation guidance with code examples, and proper context linking, continuing the established pattern of systematic code quality improvements.
Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-11T11:16:05.131Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for RStudio py311 Tekton push pipelines during PR #1379 review. Issue #1384 was successfully created covering two RStudio variants (CPU and CUDA) found in manifests/base/params-latest.env, with comprehensive problem description, implementation requirements following the same pattern as other workbench pipelines, clear acceptance criteria, and proper context linking, continuing the established pattern of systematic code quality improvements through detailed issue tracking.
Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-23T16:18:42.922Z
Learning: The TensorFlow ROCm Python 3.12 compatibility issue in opendatahub-io/notebooks PR #1259 was caused by using tensorflow-rocm==2.14.0.600 in Pipfile.lock which lacks Python 3.12 wheels, while the Pipfile specifies tensorflow_rocm=~=2.18.1. The solution requires updating Pipfile sources to include https://repo.radeon.com/rocm/manylinux/rocm-rel-6.4/ repository which contains tensorflow_rocm-2.18.1-cp312-cp312-manylinux_2_28_x86_64.whl and regenerating Pipfile.lock using the piplock-refresh GitHub Action.
Learnt from: grdryn
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1320
File: rstudio/rhel9-python-3.11/Dockerfile.cuda:34-35
Timestamp: 2025-07-04T10:41:13.061Z
Learning: In the opendatahub-io/notebooks repository, when adapting NVIDIA CUDA Dockerfiles, the project intentionally maintains consistency with upstream NVIDIA patterns even when it might involve potential risks like empty variable expansions in package installation commands. This is considered acceptable because the containers only run on RHEL 9 with known yum/dnf behavior, and upstream consistency is prioritized over defensive coding practices.
Learnt from: grdryn
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1396
File: jupyter/tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.12/Pipfile:13-14
Timestamp: 2025-07-16T00:17:10.313Z
Learning: grdryn corrected CodeRabbit's false assessment about CUDA companion package wheel availability during PR #1396 review. The original analysis incorrectly checked all package releases instead of the specific versions that would be installed with tensorflow[and-cuda]~=2.19.0. The actual versions (nvidia-cudnn-cu12/9.3.0.75, nvidia-cuda-runtime-cu12/12.5.82, nvidia-cublas-cu12/12.5.3.2) do have aarch64 wheels available on PyPI, making the and-cuda extra compatible with arm64 builds.
Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1259
File: jupyter/rocm/tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.12/Pipfile:13-15
Timestamp: 2025-07-03T07:03:45.020Z
Learning: The Python 3.11 infrastructure for ROCm TensorFlow images in opendatahub-io/notebooks is already properly configured in the Makefile with both BASE_DIRS entries for Pipfile lock renewals and all-images targets for CI builds, requiring only commenting out the corresponding Python 3.12 entries when downgrading due to wheel availability issues.
Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-06-16T11:32:09.203Z
Learning: In the opendatahub-io/notebooks repository, there is a known issue with missing `runtimes/rocm/pytorch/ubi9-python-3.11/kustomize/base/kustomization.yaml` file that causes rocm runtime tests to fail with "no such file or directory" error. This is tracked in JIRA RHOAIENG-22044 and was intended to be fixed in PR #1015.
📚 Learning: jiridanek requested github issue creation for two nitpicks during pr #1588 review: comment wording i...
Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-01T14:46:03.215Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for two nitpicks during PR #1588 review: comment wording improvement in ROCm TensorFlow Dockerfile and typo fix in Jupyter DataScience Dockerfile stage header. Issues #1589 and #1590 were successfully created with comprehensive problem descriptions, specific file locations and line numbers, clear before/after solutions, detailed acceptance criteria, and proper context linking, continuing the established pattern of systematic code quality improvements through detailed issue tracking.
Applied to files:
runtimes/rocm-tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.11/Dockerfile.rocm
runtimes/rocm-tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.12/Dockerfile.rocm
📚 Learning: the tensorflow rocm python 3.12 compatibility issue in opendatahub-io/notebooks pr #1259 was caused ...
Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-23T16:18:42.922Z
Learning: The TensorFlow ROCm Python 3.12 compatibility issue in opendatahub-io/notebooks PR #1259 was caused by using tensorflow-rocm==2.14.0.600 in Pipfile.lock which lacks Python 3.12 wheels, while the Pipfile specifies tensorflow_rocm=~=2.18.1. The solution requires updating Pipfile sources to include https://repo.radeon.com/rocm/manylinux/rocm-rel-6.4/ repository which contains tensorflow_rocm-2.18.1-cp312-cp312-manylinux_2_28_x86_64.whl and regenerating Pipfile.lock using the piplock-refresh GitHub Action.
Applied to files:
runtimes/rocm-tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.11/Dockerfile.rocm
runtimes/rocm-tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.12/Dockerfile.rocm
📚 Learning: in the opendatahub-io/notebooks repository, there is a known issue with missing `runtimes/rocm/pytor...
Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-06-16T11:32:09.203Z
Learning: In the opendatahub-io/notebooks repository, there is a known issue with missing `runtimes/rocm/pytorch/ubi9-python-3.11/kustomize/base/kustomization.yaml` file that causes rocm runtime tests to fail with "no such file or directory" error. This is tracked in JIRA RHOAIENG-22044 and was intended to be fixed in PR #1015.
Applied to files:
runtimes/rocm-tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.11/Dockerfile.rocm
runtimes/rocm-tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.12/Dockerfile.rocm
📚 Learning: jiridanek requested github issue creation for tensorflow_rocm python 3.12 compatibility problem duri...
Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1333
File: runtimes/rocm-tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.12/Pipfile:13-15
Timestamp: 2025-07-09T08:07:24.937Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for tensorflow_rocm Python 3.12 compatibility problem during PR #1333 review. Issue #1354 was successfully created with comprehensive problem description covering missing cp312 wheels causing build failures, three solution options (upstream TensorFlow, Python 3.11 only, custom build), clear acceptance criteria, and proper context linking, continuing the established pattern of systematic code quality improvements through detailed issue tracking.
Applied to files:
runtimes/rocm-tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.11/Dockerfile.rocm
runtimes/rocm-tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.12/Dockerfile.rocm
📚 Learning: jiridanek requested github issue creation for multi-architecture support in rocm tensorflow image du...
Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1333
File: runtimes/rocm-tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.12/Dockerfile.rocm:50-50
Timestamp: 2025-07-08T19:30:01.738Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for multi-architecture support in ROCm TensorFlow image during PR #1333 review. Issue #1346 was created with comprehensive problem description covering hardcoded x86_64 architecture breaking multi-arch support, detailed impact analysis, three solution options (runtime detection, BuildKit TARGETARCH integration, hybrid approach) with pros/cons analysis, comprehensive acceptance criteria covering core requirements and testing, phased implementation guidance, related files identification, and proper context linking, continuing the established pattern of systematic code quality improvements through detailed issue tracking.
Applied to files:
runtimes/rocm-tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.11/Dockerfile.rocm
runtimes/rocm-tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.12/Dockerfile.rocm
📚 Learning: the python 3.11 infrastructure for rocm tensorflow images in opendatahub-io/notebooks is already pro...
Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1259
File: jupyter/rocm/tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.12/Pipfile:13-15
Timestamp: 2025-07-03T07:03:45.020Z
Learning: The Python 3.11 infrastructure for ROCm TensorFlow images in opendatahub-io/notebooks is already properly configured in the Makefile with both BASE_DIRS entries for Pipfile lock renewals and all-images targets for CI builds, requiring only commenting out the corresponding Python 3.12 entries when downgrading due to wheel availability issues.
Applied to files:
runtimes/rocm-tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.11/Dockerfile.rocm
runtimes/rocm-tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.12/Dockerfile.rocm
📚 Learning: jiridanek requested github issue creation for bootstrapper code duplication problem in runtimes/rocm...
Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1333
File: runtimes/rocm-pytorch/ubi9-python-3.12/utils/bootstrapper.py:1-769
Timestamp: 2025-07-08T19:35:49.482Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for bootstrapper code duplication problem in runtimes/rocm-pytorch/ubi9-python-3.12/utils/bootstrapper.py during PR #1333 review. After an initial failed attempt, issue #1349 was successfully created with comprehensive problem description covering maintenance overhead and consistency risks from duplicate implementations across 5 Python 3.12 runtime environments, four solution options (symlinks, import-based, template-based, direct shared import) with pros/cons analysis, clear acceptance criteria for consolidation and maintainability, step-by-step implementation guidance, and proper context linking, continuing the established pattern of systematic code quality improvements through detailed issue tracking.
Applied to files:
runtimes/rocm-tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.11/Dockerfile.rocm
runtimes/rocm-tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.12/Dockerfile.rocm
📚 Learning: rocm is not supported by upstream tensorflow, unlike cuda. rocm support requires the specialized ten...
Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1259
File: jupyter/rocm/tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.12/Pipfile:13-15
Timestamp: 2025-07-14T15:36:29.815Z
Learning: ROCm is not supported by upstream TensorFlow, unlike CUDA. ROCm support requires the specialized tensorflow_rocm package, which creates a dependency challenge for Python 3.12 environments since tensorflow_rocm lacks Python 3.12 wheels while regular TensorFlow lacks ROCm support.
Applied to files:
runtimes/rocm-tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.11/Dockerfile.rocm
runtimes/rocm-tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.12/Dockerfile.rocm
📚 Learning: in the opendatahub-io/notebooks repository, when adapting nvidia cuda dockerfiles, the project inten...
Learnt from: grdryn
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1320
File: rstudio/rhel9-python-3.11/Dockerfile.cuda:34-35
Timestamp: 2025-07-04T10:41:13.061Z
Learning: In the opendatahub-io/notebooks repository, when adapting NVIDIA CUDA Dockerfiles, the project intentionally maintains consistency with upstream NVIDIA patterns even when it might involve potential risks like empty variable expansions in package installation commands. This is considered acceptable because the containers only run on RHEL 9 with known yum/dnf behavior, and upstream consistency is prioritized over defensive coding practices.
Applied to files:
runtimes/rocm-tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.11/Dockerfile.rocm
runtimes/rocm-tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.12/Dockerfile.rocm
📚 Learning: jiridanek creates targeted github issues for specific test quality improvements identified during pr...
Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1259
File: jupyter/rocm/tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.12/kustomize/base/service.yaml:5-15
Timestamp: 2025-07-02T18:59:15.788Z
Learning: jiridanek creates targeted GitHub issues for specific test quality improvements identified during PR reviews in opendatahub-io/notebooks. Issue #1268 demonstrates this by converting a review comment about insufficient tf2onnx conversion test validation into a comprehensive improvement plan with clear acceptance criteria, code examples, and ROCm-specific context.
Applied to files:
runtimes/rocm-tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.11/Dockerfile.rocm
📚 Learning: in the opendatahub-io/notebooks repository, mixing centos packages with ubi base images is bad pract...
Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1396
File: jupyter/tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.12/Dockerfile.cuda:192-195
Timestamp: 2025-07-18T19:01:39.811Z
Learning: In the opendatahub-io/notebooks repository, mixing CentOS packages with UBI base images is bad practice that removes supportability and creates "Frankenstein" images according to Red Hat guidance. However, using EPEL packages is acceptable, though it may require extra work with AIPCC for internal Red Hat builds. The official reference is at developers.redhat.com/articles/ubi-faq.
Applied to files:
runtimes/rocm-tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.11/Dockerfile.rocm
runtimes/rocm-tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.12/Dockerfile.rocm
📚 Learning: tensorflow_rocm package versions 2.12.1.570 through 2.14.0.600 do not provide python 3.12 wheels (cp...
Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1259
File: jupyter/rocm/tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.12/Pipfile:13-15
Timestamp: 2025-07-03T07:03:45.020Z
Learning: tensorflow_rocm package versions 2.12.1.570 through 2.14.0.600 do not provide Python 3.12 wheels (cp312) on PyPI, causing Pipfile lock failures when attempting to create Python 3.12-based ROCm TensorFlow notebook images in opendatahub-io/notebooks.
Applied to files:
runtimes/rocm-tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.12/Dockerfile.rocm
/ok-to-test |
- Removed single trailing space at the end of comment
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
- Removed single trailing space at the end of comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/ok-to-test
@satnam72: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
Hi @jiridanek, Please let me know if there’s anything else I need to do to qualify this for merging, or if I need to rerun the tests. Thanks! |
@coderabbitai ptal |
/ok-to-test |
@jiridanek I've reviewed the changes in this PR. This is a clean and straightforward improvement that perfectly addresses issue #1589. Review Summary:
The changes enhance readability and grammar as intended. Since you've already approved testing and this addresses a specific tracked improvement, the PR looks good to merge. 🧠 Learnings used
✅ Actions performedComments resolved. |
Description
Fixes #1589
runtimes/rocm-tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.11/Dockerfile.rocm
andruntimes/rocm-tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.12/Dockerfile.rocm
How Has This Been Tested?
N/A
Merge criteria:
Summary by CodeRabbit