-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 125
NO-JIRA: manifests: update orders of Image Streams #2754
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Signed-off-by: kramaranya <[email protected]>
WalkthroughThis PR updates the Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~12 minutes
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro 📒 Files selected for processing (13)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
🔇 Additional comments (14)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
| opendatahub.io/notebook-image-name: "Minimal Python" | ||
| opendatahub.io/notebook-image-desc: "Jupyter notebook image with minimal dependency set to start experimenting with Jupyter environment." | ||
| opendatahub.io/notebook-image-order: "1" | ||
| opendatahub.io/notebook-image-order: "4" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this is a testinput file, it does not get deployed to the cluster and should not participate in the imagestreams numbering
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ah, I see we have two 4's now, so 4 is the new 1; I get it now, ok
jiridanek
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm, but I'll leave merge to somebody else; keep in mind rhds/notebooks also needs update
we should think through if this will influence openshift AI upgrades in any ways; I think not
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: jiridanek The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
@kramaranya: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
Hi @kramaranya thanks for opening this PR the changes looks good to me as well. Question-did you test this changes along with you manifests in ODH and see that final dispaly on the UI? Moreover, could you share a link with your ImageStreams that you will introduce? |
Description
Updated image order numbers to start from 4, making room for the new universal training images (CUDA, ROCm, CPU) to appear at the top of the workbench dropdown.
How Has This Been Tested?
Self checklist (all need to be checked):
make test(gmakeon macOS) before asking for reviewDockerfile.konfluxfiles should be done inodh/notebooksand automatically synced torhds/notebooks. For Konflux-specific changes, modifyDockerfile.konfluxfiles directly inrhds/notebooksas these require special attention in the downstream repository and flow to the upcoming RHOAI release.Merge criteria:
Summary by CodeRabbit
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.