-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28
RHAI-ENG-306-modify-docs-on-deploying-llamastackdistribution-instanc… #898
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
RHAI-ENG-306-modify-docs-on-deploying-llamastackdistribution-instanc… #898
Conversation
WalkthroughThe documentation was updated to revise the prerequisite wording for the Llama Stack Operator and to update the LlamaStackDistribution image reference and registry information. Details about the image's hosting and related notes were removed, and the example YAML was modified to use a new image reference. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Note 🔌 MCP (Model Context Protocol) integration is now available in Early Access!Pro users can now connect to remote MCP servers under the Integrations page to get reviews and chat conversations that understand additional development context. 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
modules/deploying-a-llama-model-with-kserve.adoc (1)
13-16
: Anchor/terminology mismatch between “activated” wording and linked sectionThe prerequisite now says activated the Llama Stack Operator, but the link that follows still points to
#installing-the-llama-stack-operator_rag
.
Consider renaming the target anchor (and page heading) to activating for consistency, or adjust the prose here back to installed to avoid sending readers to a differently-worded section.No functional impact, but improving this avoids cognitive friction.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
modules/deploying-a-llama-model-with-kserve.adoc
(1 hunks)modules/deploying-a-llamastackdistribution-instance.adoc
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: bredamc
PR: opendatahub-io/opendatahub-documentation#860
File: modules/using-llm-as-a-judge-metrics-with-lmeval.adoc:62-65
Timestamp: 2025-07-16T09:05:50.422Z
Learning: In the opendatahub-documentation project, bredamc prefers comprehensive error detection in code reviews. Continue to point out potential errors whether they are related to the code changes in the PR or not, but clearly distinguish between errors introduced in the PR versus errors in existing code.
📚 Learning: 2025-07-31T15:09:05.126Z
Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/opendatahub-documentation#888
File: modules/about-workbench-images.adoc:105-105
Timestamp: 2025-07-31T15:09:05.126Z
Learning: In the opendatahub-documentation project, ROCm workbench images come pre-integrated with additional frameworks and dependencies that users can utilize, rather than requiring users to integrate frameworks themselves. When describing these images, the focus should be on the pre-integrated capabilities rather than user integration tasks.
Applied to files:
modules/deploying-a-llamastackdistribution-instance.adoc
be10050
to
8d5e418
Compare
…e - modified distribution image name in example yaml and modified prereq
…ng issue with the storage not working properly
8d5e418
to
1d463aa
Compare
…on.name field in the docs
…e - modified distribution image name in example yaml and modified prereq
Description
The LlamaStackDistribution example has been modified to change the location of the distribution image. In addition, content has been removed that is now invalid. Finally, a prerequisite item has been modified so that it more realistically represents the task that should have been carried out beforehand.
How Has This Been Tested?
Merge criteria:
Summary by CodeRabbit