-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 191
update: changes related to old upgrade logic #1785
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1785 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 24.19% 24.62% +0.43%
==========================================
Files 170 171 +1
Lines 11796 11547 -249
==========================================
- Hits 2854 2844 -10
+ Misses 8671 8432 -239
Partials 271 271 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
This PR can't be merged just yet 😢Please run For more info: https://github.com/opendatahub-io/opendatahub-operator/actions/runs/14078956671 |
- cleanup below upgrade temp workaround: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHOAIENG-4764 https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHOAIENG-13604 https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHOAIENG-15328 https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHOAIENG-443 https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHOAIENG-165 - change logic for checks on Self and Managed to non-ODH - move logf only when in upgrade case Signed-off-by: Wen Zhou <[email protected]>
FYI @TomerFi |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks okay to me -- seems like a general cleanup ticket. Not sure this even impacts Dashboard 🤔 I'll give it an approval on my side -- !=
to ODH seems find if we grow to have other offerings in the RHOAI space...
add all "impacted" stackholders here as reviewers, just to see if upgrade from existing EUS 2.16 / to be-stable 2.19 / fast 2.18 could be an issue. 😆 (hope not) |
I'm not sure whether my review is needed. Does it affect MR upgrades somehow? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: andrewballantyne, dhirajsb The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
@zdtsw: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
Description
How Has This Been Tested?
Screenshot or short clip
Merge criteria