Skip to content

Conversation

zdtsw
Copy link
Member

@zdtsw zdtsw commented Mar 23, 2025

  • cleanup below upgrade temp workaround:
  1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHOAIENG-4764
  2. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHOAIENG-13604
  3. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHOAIENG-15328
  4. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHOAIENG-443
  5. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHOAIENG-165

Description

How Has This Been Tested?

Screenshot or short clip

Merge criteria

  • You have read the contributors guide.
  • Commit messages are meaningful - have a clear and concise summary and detailed explanation of what was changed and why.
  • Pull Request contains a description of the solution, a link to the JIRA issue, and to any dependent or related Pull Request.
  • Testing instructions have been added in the PR body (for PRs involving changes that are not immediately obvious).
  • The developer has manually tested the changes and verified that the changes work

Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 24, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 22.66667% with 58 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 24.62%. Comparing base (5e0eb72) to head (2c71188).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
pkg/upgrade/upgrade_support.go 18.64% 47 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
pkg/upgrade/upgrade.go 42.85% 8 Missing ⚠️
...ntroller/components/dashboard/dashboard_support.go 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
...ents/workbenches/workbenches_controller_actions.go 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1785      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   24.19%   24.62%   +0.43%     
==========================================
  Files         170      171       +1     
  Lines       11796    11547     -249     
==========================================
- Hits         2854     2844      -10     
+ Misses       8671     8432     -239     
  Partials      271      271              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@zdtsw zdtsw marked this pull request as ready for review March 26, 2025 08:42
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from kahowell and robotmaxtron March 26, 2025 08:42
Copy link
Contributor

This PR can't be merged just yet 😢

Please run make generate manifests api-docs and commit the changes.

For more info: https://github.com/opendatahub-io/opendatahub-operator/actions/runs/14078956671

@zdtsw zdtsw requested review from dhirajsb, andrewballantyne and AjayJagan and removed request for kahowell and robotmaxtron March 26, 2025 08:49
@zdtsw
Copy link
Member Author

zdtsw commented Mar 26, 2025

FYI @TomerFi

Copy link
Member

@andrewballantyne andrewballantyne left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks okay to me -- seems like a general cleanup ticket. Not sure this even impacts Dashboard 🤔 I'll give it an approval on my side -- != to ODH seems find if we grow to have other offerings in the RHOAI space...

@zdtsw
Copy link
Member Author

zdtsw commented Mar 26, 2025

Looks okay to me -- seems like a general cleanup ticket. Not sure this even impacts Dashboard 🤔 I'll give it an approval on my side -- != to ODH seems find if we grow to have other offerings in the RHOAI space...

add all "impacted" stackholders here as reviewers, just to see if upgrade from existing EUS 2.16 / to be-stable 2.19 / fast 2.18 could be an issue. 😆 (hope not)

@dhirajsb
Copy link
Contributor

I'm not sure whether my review is needed. Does it affect MR upgrades somehow?

Copy link
Contributor

@dhirajsb dhirajsb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 11, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: andrewballantyne, dhirajsb
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign lburgazzoli for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 10, 2025

@zdtsw: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/ci-bundle-opendatahub-operator-bundle 2c71188 link true /test ci-bundle-opendatahub-operator-bundle
ci/prow/opendatahub-operator-e2e 2c71188 link true /test opendatahub-operator-e2e

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
Status: Todo
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants