Update dependency pytest-asyncio to ^0.26.0

[red-hat-konflux]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Change	Age	Confidence
pytest-asyncio (changelog)	^0.23.6 -> ^0.26.0

---

Release Notes

pytest-dev/pytest-asyncio (pytest-asyncio)

v0.26.0: pytest-asyncio 0.26.0

Compare Source

• Adds configuration option that sets default event loop scope for all tests #​793
• Improved type annotations for pytest_asyncio.fixture #​1045
• Added typing-extensions as additional dependency for Python <3.10 #​1045

v0.25.3: pytest-asyncio 0.25.3

Compare Source

• Avoid errors in cleanup of async generators when event loop is already closed #​1040

v0.25.2: pytest-asyncio 0.25.2

Compare Source

• Call loop.shutdown_asyncgens() before closing the event loop to ensure async generators are closed in the same manner as asyncio.run does #​1034

v0.25.1: pytest-asyncio 0.25.1

Compare Source

• Fixes an issue that caused a broken event loop when a function-scoped test was executed in between two tests with wider loop scope #​950
• Improves test collection speed in auto mode #​1020
• Corrects the warning that is emitted upon redefining the event_loop fixture

v0.25.0: pytest-asyncio 0.25.0

Compare Source

0.25.0 (2024-12-13)

• Deprecated: Added warning when asyncio test requests async @pytest.fixture in strict mode. This will become an error in a future version of flake8-asyncio. #​979
• Updates the error message about pytest.mark.asyncio's scope keyword argument to say loop_scope instead. #​1004
• Verbose log displays correct parameter name: asyncio_default_fixture_loop_scope #​990
• Propagates contextvars set in async fixtures to other fixtures and tests on Python 3.11 and above. #​1008

v0.24.0: pytest-asyncio 0.24.0

Compare Source

0.24.0 (2024-08-22)

• BREAKING: Updated minimum supported pytest version to v8.2.0
• Adds an optional loop_scope keyword argument to pytest.mark.asyncio. This argument controls which event loop is used to run the marked async test. #​706, #​871
• Deprecates the optional scope keyword argument to pytest.mark.asyncio for API consistency with pytest_asyncio.fixture. Users are encouraged to use the loop_scope keyword argument, which does exactly the same.
• Raises an error when passing scope or loop_scope as a positional argument to @pytest.mark.asyncio. #​812
• Fixes a bug that caused module-scoped async fixtures to fail when reused in other modules #​862 #​668

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "after 5am on saturday" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

To execute skipped test pipelines write comment /ok-to-test.

This PR has been generated by MintMaker (powered by Renovate Bot).

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: red-hat-konflux[bot]
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign vaibhavjainwiz for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[openshift-ci]

Hi @red-hat-konflux[bot]. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a opendatahub-io member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.