Skip to content

Conversation

@Pavilion4ik
Copy link
Contributor

@Pavilion4ik Pavilion4ik commented Jan 16, 2026

This PR improves readability of Django admin preview fields when using dark mode.

What?

  • Replaced hardcoded inline styles in Django admin preview fields with theme-aware CSS classes.
  • Added dedicated admin.css to style base template preview, effective config preview, and validation status.
  • Ensured preview blocks adapt correctly to both light and dark admin themes.

Why?

  • Inline styles with hardcoded light colors made preview fields barely readable in Django admin dark mode.
  • Using Django admin CSS variables ensures consistent appearance and prevents future theme-related regressions.
  • Improves overall admin UX and maintainability of preview-related code.

Issue: #84

- Replaced inline styles with theme-aware admin CSS variables
- Moved preview styling to static admin.css
- Improved readability of preview and validation fields
@openedx-webhooks openedx-webhooks added the open-source-contribution PR author is not from Axim or 2U label Jan 16, 2026
@openedx-webhooks
Copy link

Thanks for the pull request, @Pavilion4ik!

This repository is currently maintained by @felipemontoya.

Once you've gone through the following steps feel free to tag them in a comment and let them know that your changes are ready for engineering review.

🔘 Get product approval

If you haven't already, check this list to see if your contribution needs to go through the product review process.

  • If it does, you'll need to submit a product proposal for your contribution, and have it reviewed by the Product Working Group.
    • This process (including the steps you'll need to take) is documented here.
  • If it doesn't, simply proceed with the next step.
🔘 Provide context

To help your reviewers and other members of the community understand the purpose and larger context of your changes, feel free to add as much of the following information to the PR description as you can:

  • Dependencies

    This PR must be merged before / after / at the same time as ...

  • Blockers

    This PR is waiting for OEP-1234 to be accepted.

  • Timeline information

    This PR must be merged by XX date because ...

  • Partner information

    This is for a course on edx.org.

  • Supporting documentation
  • Relevant Open edX discussion forum threads
🔘 Get a green build

If one or more checks are failing, continue working on your changes until this is no longer the case and your build turns green.

Details
Where can I find more information?

If you'd like to get more details on all aspects of the review process for open source pull requests (OSPRs), check out the following resources:

When can I expect my changes to be merged?

Our goal is to get community contributions seen and reviewed as efficiently as possible.

However, the amount of time that it takes to review and merge a PR can vary significantly based on factors such as:

  • The size and impact of the changes that it introduces
  • The need for product review
  • Maintenance status of the parent repository

💡 As a result it may take up to several weeks or months to complete a review and merge your PR.

- Fixed linter
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 16, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 90.74%. Comparing base (5e02075) to head (e286e73).
⚠️ Report is 8 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #101      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   90.58%   90.74%   +0.16%     
==========================================
  Files          47       48       +1     
  Lines        4310     4389      +79     
  Branches      271      271              
==========================================
+ Hits         3904     3983      +79     
  Misses        317      317              
  Partials       89       89              
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 90.74% <ø> (+0.16%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@mphilbrick211 mphilbrick211 moved this from Needs Triage to Ready for Review in Contributions Jan 16, 2026
@Henrrypg
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @Pavilion4ik I'll be checking your PRs today

Copy link
Contributor

@Henrrypg Henrrypg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just a couple of minor changes, It worked pretty fine in my local, great job @Pavilion4ik :)

}),
('Prompt Content', {
'fields': ('body',),
'description': 'The prompt template text - edit in the big textbox below.'
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There are some comments here we don't to remove from now, please keep this one as before

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done

'JSON5 Merge Patch (RFC 7386) to override base template values. '
'Supports comments (//, /* */), trailing commas, and unquoted keys. '
'Validation results appear in the "Preview & Validation" section below.'
'JSON5 Merge Patch (RFC 7386). Supports comments, trailing commas, '
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's keep this one as before too

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done

@Henrrypg
Copy link
Contributor

And please if can edit the cover letter, this is actually solving #84 instead of 91

- Restored the earlier version of comments
Copy link
Contributor

@Henrrypg Henrrypg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Member

@felipemontoya felipemontoya left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. I'll merge now

@felipemontoya felipemontoya merged commit 2541c58 into openedx:main Jan 21, 2026
10 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Ready for Review to Done in Contributions Jan 21, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

open-source-contribution PR author is not from Axim or 2U

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants