Skip to content

Conversation

@aaguiarz
Copy link
Member

Description

What problem is being solved?

How is it being solved?

What changes are made to solve it?

References

Review Checklist

  • I have clicked on "allow edits by maintainers".
  • I have added documentation for new/changed functionality in this PR or in a PR to openfga.dev [Provide a link to any relevant PRs in the references section above]
  • The correct base branch is being used, if not main
  • I have added tests to validate that the change in functionality is working as expected

@aaguiarz aaguiarz requested review from a team as code owners September 19, 2025 14:20
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 19, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@aaguiarz has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 23 minutes and 11 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2fc57da and 43319ce.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch chore/add-badges

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@aaguiarz aaguiarz changed the title chore: add scorecard, deepwiki and socket.dev badges chore(docs): add scorecard, deepwiki and socket.dev badges Sep 19, 2025
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Sep 19, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 35.19%. Comparing base (2fc57da) to head (43319ce).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main     #220   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     35.19%   35.19%           
  Complexity     1071     1071           
=========================================
  Files           187      187           
  Lines          7087     7087           
  Branches        803      803           
=========================================
  Hits           2494     2494           
  Misses         4483     4483           
  Partials        110      110           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@aaguiarz aaguiarz enabled auto-merge September 19, 2025 14:26
@aaguiarz aaguiarz added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 19, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit 7c9e599 Sep 19, 2025
25 checks passed
@aaguiarz aaguiarz deleted the chore/add-badges branch September 19, 2025 14:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants