Skip to content

Conversation

@eme64
Copy link
Contributor

@eme64 eme64 commented Jan 8, 2026

This is a very similar issue as #29033 / JDK-8374489.

There are NaN encodings that have the sign bit set, and others that have it not set.
If we now copy the sign from such a NaN to a numeric value (e.g. 1), we can get 1 or -1.

jshell> var a = Float.NaN;
a ==> NaN
jshell> var b = Float.intBitsToFloat(0xFFC00000);
b ==> NaN
jshell> Math.copySign(1f, a)
==> 1.0
jshell> Math.copySign(1f, b)
==> -1.0
jshell> Float16.copySign(Float16.valueOf(1f), Float16.valueOf(a))
==> 1.0
jshell> Float16.copySign(Float16.valueOf(1f), Float16.valueOf(b))
==> -1.0

Since NaN values of different encodings are interchangable, and we cannot know what NaN we get, and hence the sign bit is arbitrary, we can also not know the sign of the result of Float16.copySign. We have to mark it as non-deterministic and hence disable result verification.

Since this is a test-bug, I have no regression test. But I verified it manually, that with the same seed (for the ExpressionFuzzer) that fails before this change, we now succeed after the change.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8374785: Template Library: need to tag Float16.copySign as having non-deterministic result because of multiple NaNs with different sign bits (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/29118/head:pull/29118
$ git checkout pull/29118

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/29118
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/29118/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 29118

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 29118

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/29118.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jan 8, 2026

👋 Welcome back epeter! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 8, 2026

@eme64 This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8374785: Template Library: need to tag Float16.copySign as having non-deterministic result because of multiple NaNs with different sign bits

Reviewed-by: thartmann, qamai

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 82 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title JDK-8374785 8374785: Template Library: need to tag Float16.copySign as having non-deterministic result because of multiple NaNs with different sign bits Jan 8, 2026
@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org label Jan 8, 2026
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 8, 2026

@eme64 The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-compiler

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@eme64 eme64 marked this pull request as ready for review January 8, 2026 14:55
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jan 8, 2026
Copy link
Member

@TobiHartmann TobiHartmann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jan 8, 2026
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jan 8, 2026

Webrevs

@eme64
Copy link
Contributor Author

eme64 commented Jan 12, 2026

@merykitty @TobiHartmann Thanks for the reviews!

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 12, 2026

Going to push as commit 2fbe475.
Since your change was applied there have been 83 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jan 12, 2026
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jan 12, 2026
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jan 12, 2026
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 12, 2026

@eme64 Pushed as commit 2fbe475.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants