Skip to content

Conversation

@cushon
Copy link
Contributor

@cushon cushon commented Nov 1, 2025

This is a backport of JDK-8354893, which is a follow-up to JDK-8341779.


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • JDK-8354893 needs maintainer approval

Integration blocker

 ⚠️ Dependency #4150 must be integrated first

Issue

  • JDK-8354893: [REDO BACKPORT] javac crashes while adding type annotations to the return type of a constructor (JDK-8320001) (Bug - P2)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/4151/head:pull/4151
$ git checkout pull/4151

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/4151
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/4151/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 4151

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 4151

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4151.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Nov 1, 2025

👋 Welcome back cushon! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into pr/4150 will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 1, 2025

❗ This change is not yet ready to be integrated.
See the Progress checklist in the description for automated requirements.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport b2225c8c491e9a5f4f6d2ef14338369d681d6110 8354893: [REDO BACKPORT] javac crashes while adding type annotations to the return type of a constructor (JDK-8320001) Nov 1, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 1, 2025

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk openjdk bot added backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base clean Identical backport; no merge resolution required labels Nov 1, 2025
@cushon cushon marked this pull request as ready for review November 1, 2025 21:42
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Nov 1, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Nov 1, 2025

Webrevs

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Nov 30, 2025

@cushon This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply issue a /touch or /keepalive command to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration!

@cushon
Copy link
Contributor Author

cushon commented Nov 30, 2025

/touch

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 30, 2025

@cushon The pull request is being re-evaluated and the inactivity timeout has been reset.

Copy link

@vicente-romero-oracle vicente-romero-oracle left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base clean Identical backport; no merge resolution required rfr Pull request is ready for review

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants