Skip to content

Conversation

@mrserb
Copy link
Member

@mrserb mrserb commented Sep 10, 2025

WIP


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • JDK-8331030 needs maintainer approval

Issue

  • JDK-8331030: langtools/tools/javac/tree tests fail with SOE with fastdebug and -Xcomp (Bug - P4)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/2169/head:pull/2169
$ git checkout pull/2169

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/2169
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/2169/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 2169

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 2169

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2169.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Sep 10, 2025

👋 Welcome back serb! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 10, 2025

❗ This change is not yet ready to be integrated.
See the Progress checklist in the description for automated requirements.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport d43654e5733a4ad535e95d908de528ef29285e92 8331030: langtools/tools/javac/tree tests fail with SOE with fastdebug and -Xcomp Sep 10, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 10, 2025

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk openjdk bot added backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base clean Identical backport; no merge resolution required labels Sep 10, 2025
@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Nov 5, 2025

@mrserb This pull request has been inactive for more than 8 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 8 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply issue a /touch or /keepalive command to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration!

@mrserb
Copy link
Member Author

mrserb commented Nov 5, 2025

/touch

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 5, 2025

@mrserb The pull request is being re-evaluated and the inactivity timeout has been reset.

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jan 1, 2026

@mrserb This pull request has been inactive for more than 8 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 8 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply issue a /touch or /keepalive command to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration!

@mrserb
Copy link
Member Author

mrserb commented Jan 2, 2026

/keepalive

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 2, 2026

@mrserb The pull request is being re-evaluated and the inactivity timeout has been reset.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base clean Identical backport; no merge resolution required

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant