8297088: Update LCMS to 2.14

[kvergizova]

I'd like to backport it for parity with Oracle 8u.
11u patch applies almost cleanly, except for a license update in THIRD_PARTY_README instead of lcms.md.
I also fixed the file paths in UPDATING.txt instructions so that they match the paths in OpenJDK8.

GHA testing revealed no regressions, additionally tested manually with J2Ddemo.

---

Progress

• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue
• JDK-8297088 needs maintainer approval

Issue

• JDK-8297088: Update LCMS to 2.14 (Bug - P3)

Reviewers

• Alexey Bakhtin (@alexeybakhtin - Committer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev.git pull/677/head:pull/677
$ git checkout pull/677

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/677
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev.git pull/677/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 677

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 677

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev/pull/677.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back evergizova! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

❗ This change is not yet ready to be integrated.
See the Progress checklist in the description for automated requirements.

[openjdk]

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 01: Full - Incremental (6f31652b)
• 00: Full (7536819c)

[gnu-andrew]

Patch itself looks ok. Could you re-run the Windows x86_64 build? It seems to be failing in an odd way (failing to build FreeType) that I can't see is related to the change.

[kvergizova]

Patch itself looks ok. Could you re-run the Windows x86_64 build? It seems to be failing in an odd way (failing to build FreeType) that I can't see is related to the change.

@gnu-andrew, thanks for the review.
It looks like the problem with Windows builds were fixed by 41e6bf7

All builds have passed successfully after the merge, and the remaining test failures don't seem to be related to the backport:

• security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/CAInterop.java#actalisauthenticationrootca
• gc/concurrentMarkSweep/SystemGCOnForegroundCollector.java
• runtime/7158988/FieldMonitor.java