-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 91
Feat/skew protection #3147
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft
pieh
wants to merge
8
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
feat/skew-protection
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Feat/skew protection #3147
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
ece4338
test: setup for skew protection e2e tests and first test (server acti…
pieh 7ba5192
feat: support skew protection
pieh a68962a
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into feat/skew-protection
pieh fae7557
test: use enums in tests and not string values
pieh 92cfc9a
test: export skew protection config and assert that configuration fil…
pieh edaa88f
refactor: use early bails in logic deciding wether to enable skew pro…
pieh b2f9883
test: group env var enablement/disablement tests
pieh 9239542
test: skip building skew protection fixture for integration tests
pieh File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was thinking about the case of turning on skew protection, then disabling it in the following deploy, is that possible? Is that something that would ever be done? Currently this setting looks to be scoped to the site level rather than per deploy (like blobs is for example), so unsure of the mechanics here and whether it would take the most recent settings each time or work another way.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Skew protection is deploy-level configuration / metadata in similar way as redirects/rewrites are. It is possible to turn it off for future deploys by just not producing configuration for it.
This config file will be wiped automatically because it's part of Frameworks API which does have automatic cleanup ( ( https://github.com/netlify/build/blob/main/packages/build/src/plugins_core/pre_cleanup/index.ts ) so we don't have to ensure it doesn't exist here to handle case of turning it on and later turning it off.
I don't see a reason why one would do that, unless bugs / not handled edge cases would be uncovered in the future.