Skip to content

Conversation

@tschut
Copy link
Contributor

@tschut tschut commented Jan 6, 2026

What's changed?

What's your motivation?

Anything in particular you'd like reviewers to focus on?

Anyone you would like to review specifically?

Have you considered any alternatives or workarounds?

Any additional context

Checklist

  • I've added unit tests to cover both positive and negative cases
  • I've read and applied the recipe conventions and best practices
  • I've used the IntelliJ IDEA auto-formatter on affected files

Copy link
Member

@timtebeek timtebeek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks a lot!

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In Progress to Ready to Review in OpenRewrite Jan 6, 2026
@timtebeek timtebeek merged commit 1e71ddc into openrewrite:main Jan 6, 2026
2 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Ready to Review to Done in OpenRewrite Jan 6, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

Archived in project

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Jackson 3 upgrade: include package change for com.fasterxml.jackson.module.*

2 participants