Skip to content

[release-v1.17] Update Konflux configurations #1327

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: release-v1.17
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

serverless-qe
Copy link

Update Konflux components and pipelines

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from dsimansk and jrangelramos July 14, 2025 08:20
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 14, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: serverless-qe
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign dsimansk for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jul 14, 2025

⚠️ Please install the 'codecov app svg image' to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
⚠️ Please upload report for BASE (release-v1.17@59fcfbc). Learn more about missing BASE report.
❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##             release-v1.17    #1327   +/-   ##
================================================
  Coverage                 ?   53.04%           
================================================
  Files                    ?      131           
  Lines                    ?    15614           
  Branches                 ?        0           
================================================
  Hits                     ?     8283           
  Misses                   ?     6567           
  Partials                 ?      764           
Flag Coverage Δ
e2e-test-runtime-node 25.68% <ø> (?)
e2e-test-runtime-python 25.68% <ø> (?)
e2e-test-runtime-quarkus 25.82% <ø> (?)
e2e-test-runtime-rust 24.78% <ø> (?)
e2e-test-runtime-springboot 24.82% <ø> (?)
e2e-test-runtime-typescript 25.78% <ø> (?)
unit-tests 49.24% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@serverless-qe serverless-qe force-pushed the sync-konflux-release-v1.17 branch 3 times, most recently from 8994cff to 409994b Compare July 17, 2025 20:47
@serverless-qe serverless-qe force-pushed the sync-konflux-release-v1.17 branch from 409994b to c23359e Compare July 23, 2025 08:46
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 23, 2025

@serverless-qe: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/418-e2e-oncluster-test 409994b link true /test 418-e2e-oncluster-test
ci/prow/419-e2e-oncluster-test c23359e link true /test 419-e2e-oncluster-test
ci/prow/420-e2e-oncluster-test c23359e link true /test 420-e2e-oncluster-test

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants