fix(cel): add nil checks to prevent panics in webhook parsers #2348
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @theakshaypant, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request addresses a critical stability issue by introducing robust nil pointer checks in the webhook parsing logic for GitHub, GitLab, and Gitea events. The primary goal is to prevent application panics that could occur when webhook payloads lack expected nested fields, thereby enhancing the overall resilience and reliability of event processing. Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
🔍 PR Lint Feedback
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request is a great improvement for robustness, adding necessary nil checks to the webhook parsers to prevent panics. The changes are well-implemented across GitHub, GitLab, and Gitea parsers. The addition of unit tests to cover these new checks is also excellent. I've made a couple of suggestions to refactor the IssueCommentEvent handling in both the GitHub and Gitea parsers to improve readability and avoid redundant checks. Overall, this is a solid fix.
theakshaypant
force-pushed
the
SRVKP-9396-fix-cli-cel-panic-for-empty-fields
branch
from
7d96533 to
8531b07
Compare
Add comprehensive nil pointer checks in PopulateEvent methods for webhook parsers to prevent panics when accessing nested fields that may be nil or missing from webhook payloads. Jira: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SRVKP-9396 Signed-off-by: Akshay Pant <[email protected]>
theakshaypant
force-pushed
the
SRVKP-9396-fix-cli-cel-panic-for-empty-fields
branch
from
8531b07 to
94c61b3
Compare
1 participant
📝 Description of the Change
Add comprehensive nil pointer checks in PopulateEvent methods for webhook parsers to prevent panics when accessing nested fields that may be nil or missing from webhook payloads.
👨🏻 Linked Jira
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SRVKP-9396
🔗 Linked GitHub Issue
N/A
🚀 Type of Change
fix:)feat:)feat!:,fix!:)docs:)chore:)refactor:)enhance:)deps:)🧪 Testing Strategy
🤖 AI Assistance
If you have used AI assistance, please provide the following details:
Which LLM was used?
Extent of AI Assistance:
Important
If the majority of the code in this PR was generated by an AI, please add a
Co-authored-bytrailer to your commit message.For example:
Co-authored-by: Gemini [email protected]
Co-authored-by: ChatGPT [email protected]
Co-authored-by: Claude [email protected]
Co-authored-by: Cursor [email protected]
Co-authored-by: Copilot [email protected]
**💡You can use the script
./hack/add-llm-coauthor.shto automatically addthese co-author trailers to your commits.
✅ Submitter Checklist
fix:,feat:) matches the "Type of Change" I selected above.make testandmake lintlocally to check for and fix anyissues. For an efficient workflow, I have considered installing
pre-commit and running
pre-commit installtoautomate these checks.