Skip to content

Conversation

@juzhao
Copy link
Contributor

@juzhao juzhao commented Dec 1, 2025

see OCPBUGS-61088, create networkpolicy settings for user workload monitoring

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/severity-moderate Referenced Jira bug's severity is moderate for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Dec 1, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@juzhao: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-66180, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.21.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.21.0)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @juzhao

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

see OCPBUGS-61088, create networkpolicy settings for user workload monitoring

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 1, 2025

@openshift-ci-robot: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: juzhao.

Note that only openshift members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs.

In response to this:

@juzhao: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-66180, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.21.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.21.0)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @juzhao

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

see OCPBUGS-61088, create networkpolicy settings for user workload monitoring

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from machine424 and slashpai December 1, 2025 09:41
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 1, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: juzhao
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign jan--f for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@juzhao
Copy link
Contributor Author

juzhao commented Dec 1, 2025

/hold
in-cluster networkpolicy PR is reverted due to block ROSA jobs(need to add networkpolicy to ROSA), #2766

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Dec 1, 2025
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Dec 1, 2025
@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 3, 2025

@juzhao: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/versions 3ea8e78 link false /test versions
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade 3ea8e78 link true /test e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade
ci/prow/misspell 3ea8e78 link true /test misspell

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. jira/severity-moderate Referenced Jira bug's severity is moderate for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants