Skip to content

Conversation

@juzhao
Copy link
Contributor

@juzhao juzhao commented Dec 3, 2025

This reverts commit 86d9e8c. PR: #2766
after the ROSA feature https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ROSA-634 is finished, we can merge the PR
/hold

…nfig_test.go and let CVO manage CMO networkpolicies"

This reverts commit 86d9e8c.
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Dec 3, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Dec 3, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@juzhao: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-61088, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, POST, but it is Verified instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

This reverts commit 86d9e8c.
after the ROSA feature https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ROSA-634 is finished, we can merge the PR
/hold

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@juzhao
Copy link
Contributor Author

juzhao commented Dec 3, 2025

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Dec 3, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@juzhao: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-61088, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.21.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.21.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @juzhao

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 3, 2025

@openshift-ci-robot: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: juzhao.

Note that only openshift members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs.

In response to this:

@juzhao: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-61088, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.21.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.21.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @juzhao

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@juzhao
Copy link
Contributor Author

juzhao commented Dec 3, 2025

/retest

@juzhao
Copy link
Contributor Author

juzhao commented Dec 3, 2025

/verified by @juzhao

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Dec 3, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@juzhao: This PR has been marked as verified by @juzhao.

In response to this:

/verified by @juzhao

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@machine424
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 3, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 3, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: juzhao, machine424

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 3, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Dec 4, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 4, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 4, 2025

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@juzhao
Copy link
Contributor Author

juzhao commented Dec 4, 2025

needs #2771 to merge first

@juzhao
Copy link
Contributor Author

juzhao commented Dec 4, 2025

/retest-required

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Dec 4, 2025
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Dec 4, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 4, 2025

@juzhao: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@juzhao
Copy link
Contributor Author

juzhao commented Dec 5, 2025

/verified by @juzhao

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Dec 5, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@juzhao: This PR has been marked as verified by @juzhao.

In response to this:

/verified by @juzhao

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants