-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33
OPRUN-3690: Watch for new upstream feature gate APIV1MetasHandler #104
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
OPRUN-3690: Watch for new upstream feature gate APIV1MetasHandler #104
Conversation
d295155
to
d316d8f
Compare
@anik120: This pull request references OPRUN-3690 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
@anik120: This pull request references OPRUN-3690 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
d316d8f
to
e280153
Compare
Moving the dep updates to #105, will rebase this PR once 105 is merged. |
e280153
to
057c82b
Compare
@anik120: This pull request references OPRUN-3690 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
057c82b
to
6cd0f29
Compare
/test okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn |
7ffe803
to
c154b70
Compare
/hold cluster-bot failed to bring up a cluster with this PR with reason
(ref 1. for logs) which highlighted that installer is at the old version of openshift/api. Holding this PR till openshift/installer is updated so that CI is not broken because of this PR. |
c154b70
to
dcaddc0
Compare
@anik120: This pull request references OPRUN-3690 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
Bumping openshift/api to e8e096a21cb3dbeb93f1dc5138bf42ec766fc407 to pull in openshift/api#2214 |
dcaddc0
to
ae00e33
Compare
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: anik120, grokspawn The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
ae00e33
to
fd313cb
Compare
/payload-aggregate periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.19-e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-techpreview 5 |
@anik120: trigger 3 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command
See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/ec0506c0-f600-11ef-840c-63c74d881a13-0 |
Turns out openshift/library-go#1940 was the issue. #108 re-did the k8s bumps after openshift/library-go#1940 was merged. So pulling in #108 in this PR and re-testing again to confirm issue has been resolved. |
Bumping openshift/api because the operator-framework team is interested in pulling in two commits: 1. [featuregate for catalogd metas web api](openshift/api@d0f74a9) 2. (Follow up to 1) [Fix FeatureGateNewOLMCatalogdAPIV1Metas spelling error](openshift/api@275cd40) This is motivated by the failure seen in openshift/cluster-olm-operator#104 which [ran into the issue of the cluster failing to come up because the new featuregate was not being registered](openshift/cluster-olm-operator#104 (comment)). Steps taken: 1. go get github.com/openshift/api@e8e096a21cb3dbeb93f1dc5138bf42ec766fc407 2. go mod tidy 3. go mod vendor Signed-off-by: Anik Bhattacharjee <[email protected]>
/retest |
refer: * [Metas Endpoint RFC](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1s6_9IFEKGQLNh3ueH7SF4Yrx4PW9NSiNFqFIJx0pU-8/edit?usp=sharing) * [PR that introduced metas endpoint in catalogd](operator-framework/operator-controller-1643) * [APIV1MetasHandler naming](operator-framework/operator-controller@45cdb37#diff-03c0636b035013a21712c5f4f04a30ae71ef533c9aa4a6d0724dc5575bf0dffdR9) * [Guide this PR followed for mapping upstream APIV1MetasHandler feature gate to downstream FeatureGateNewOLMCatalogdMetas} feature gate](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1krN-4vwaE47aLRW9QjwD374-0Sh80taa_7goqVNi_-s/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.th7069vduyim) Also bumps openshift/api to v0.0.0-20250228110707-635291d6fdf1
e0f4e63
to
3b249a9
Compare
I think we're unblocked at this point /unhold |
Verified everything works as expected 🎉 :
|
/lgtm |
@anik120: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER] Distgit: ose-cluster-olm-operator |
refer:
Also bumps openshift/api to e8e096a21cb3dbeb93f1dc5138bf42ec766fc407