Skip to content

Conversation

wking
Copy link
Member

@wking wking commented Oct 9, 2025

CVO does not honor client certificates per the OCP metrics standard and HCP does not configure the secret. The combination of these two things means that on HCP, if we enable the CVO's auth handler, we lose the ability to determine if clusteroperators are functioning correctly at scale.

Clean pick forward to main from #1242.

CVO does not honor client certificates per the OCP metrics standard and
HCP does not configure the secret.  The combination of these two things
means that on HCP, if we enable the CVO's auth handler, we lose the
ability to determine if clusteroperators are functioning correctly at
scale.
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Oct 9, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@wking: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62861, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.21.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.21.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira ([email protected]), skipping review request.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

CVO does not honor client certificates per the OCP metrics standard and HCP does not configure the secret. The combination of these two things means that on HCP, if we enable the CVO's auth handler, we lose the ability to determine if clusteroperators are functioning correctly at scale.

Clean pick forward to main from #1242.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 9, 2025
go func() {
defer utilruntime.HandleCrash()
err := cvo.RunMetrics(postMainContext, shutdownContext, o.ListenAddr, o.ServingCertFile, o.ServingKeyFile, restConfig)
disableMetricsAuth := o.InjectClusterIdIntoPromQL // this is wired to the "--hypershift" flag, so when hypershfit is no, we disableMetricsAuth
Copy link
Contributor

@DavidHurta DavidHurta Oct 9, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Starting 4.19, we can utilize the o.HyperShift variable instead. Their values are the same and very unlikely to change, so I will not block the PRs on this.

@DavidHurta
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

@DavidHurta
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 9, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 9, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: DavidHurta, wking

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@sdodson
Copy link
Member

sdodson commented Oct 9, 2025

/verified by @sjenning @deads2k

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Oct 9, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@sdodson: This PR has been marked as verified by @sjenning @deads2k.

In response to this:

/verified by @sjenning @deads2k

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 9, 2025

@wking: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn 8d7bf25 link false /test okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 4b8d15e into openshift:main Oct 9, 2025
15 of 16 checks passed
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@wking: Jira Issue Verification Checks: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62861
✔️ This pull request was pre-merge verified.
✔️ All associated pull requests have merged.
✔️ All associated, merged pull requests were pre-merge verified.

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62861 has been moved to the MODIFIED state and will move to the VERIFIED state when the change is available in an accepted nightly payload. 🕓

In response to this:

CVO does not honor client certificates per the OCP metrics standard and HCP does not configure the secret. The combination of these two things means that on HCP, if we enable the CVO's auth handler, we lose the ability to determine if clusteroperators are functioning correctly at scale.

Clean pick forward to main from #1242.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants