Skip to content

Conversation

@mpatlasov
Copy link
Contributor

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/STOR-2523
/cc @openshift/storage

Names deploymentInformer and controlPlaneKubeClient looked misleading. They point to management cluster, so managementClusterDeploymentInformer and managementClusterKubeClient are better names.

…ents

Names `deploymentInformer` and `controlPlaneKubeClient` looked misleading. They point to management cluster, so `managementClusterDeploymentInformer` and `managementClusterKubeClient` are better names.
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Nov 27, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 27, 2025

@mpatlasov: This pull request references STOR-2523 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the epic to target either version "4.21." or "openshift-4.21.", but it targets "openshift-4.22" instead.

In response to this:

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/STOR-2523
/cc @openshift/storage

Names deploymentInformer and controlPlaneKubeClient looked misleading. They point to management cluster, so managementClusterDeploymentInformer and managementClusterKubeClient are better names.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 27, 2025

@mpatlasov: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: openshift/storage.

Note that only openshift members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs.

In response to this:

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/STOR-2523
/cc @openshift/storage

Names deploymentInformer and controlPlaneKubeClient looked misleading. They point to management cluster, so managementClusterDeploymentInformer and managementClusterKubeClient are better names.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 27, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mpatlasov
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign p0lyn0mial for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 27, 2025

@mpatlasov: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

controlPlaneNamespace string
controllerDeploymentName string
managementClusterDeploymentInformer appsinformersv1.DeploymentInformer
operatorClient v1helpers.OperatorClientWithFinalizers
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should we rename this to guestClusterOperatorClient ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants