Skip to content

Conversation

RishabhSaini
Copy link
Contributor

@RishabhSaini RishabhSaini commented Aug 21, 2025

- What I did
crc & kcc: Before deleting a degraded MC, ensure that the annotations have not been updated since the last check

- How to verify it
Check OCPBUGS-56558

- Description for the changelog

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/severity-important Referenced Jira bug's severity is important for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Aug 21, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@RishabhSaini: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-56558, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target either version "4.20." or "openshift-4.20.", but it targets "4.16.z" instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

crc & kcc: Before deleting a degraded MC, ensure that the annotations have not been updated since the last check

- What I did

- How to verify it

- Description for the changelog

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 21, 2025
@RishabhSaini
Copy link
Contributor Author

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Aug 21, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@RishabhSaini: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-56558, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.20.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.20.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @sergiordlr

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from sergiordlr August 21, 2025 15:14
Copy link
Contributor

@yuqi-zhang yuqi-zhang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

Discussed this with Rishabh, the issue does appear to be an outdated MC from the lister, so the additional get() here should be sufficient since this should almost never happen.

The delete condition may be a bit loose since the comment suggests that we should only be deleting the MC if it is causing a degrade, but we're not really accounting for a non-upgradeable CRC and just deleting it if the annotation is from an older controller. Worth keeping in mind if this comes up again.

/hold

for per-merge verification

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 21, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. and removed lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. labels Aug 21, 2025
@RishabhSaini
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest-required

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 29, 2025

@RishabhSaini: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn c2c1b70 link false /test okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-mco-disruptive c2c1b70 link false /test e2e-gcp-mco-disruptive
ci/prow/e2e-aws-mco-disruptive c2c1b70 link false /test e2e-aws-mco-disruptive
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-op-ocl c2c1b70 link false /test e2e-gcp-op-ocl
ci/prow/bootstrap-unit c2c1b70 link false /test bootstrap-unit
ci/prow/e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade-out-of-change c2c1b70 link false /test e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade-out-of-change

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Copy link
Member

@isabella-janssen isabella-janssen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 29, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 29, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: isabella-janssen, RishabhSaini, yuqi-zhang

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [RishabhSaini,isabella-janssen,yuqi-zhang]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/jira refresh

The requirements for Jira bugs have changed (Jira issues linked to PRs on main branch need to target different OCP), recalculating validity.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Sep 2, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-56558, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target either version "4.21." or "openshift-4.21.", but it targets "4.20.0" instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

The requirements for Jira bugs have changed (Jira issues linked to PRs on main branch need to target different OCP), recalculating validity.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@yuqi-zhang
Copy link
Contributor

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Sep 2, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@yuqi-zhang: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-56558, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.21.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.21.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @sergiordlr

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@yuqi-zhang
Copy link
Contributor

After discussions, we've determined that this is hard to pre-merge verify as the race is very rare. The fix should otherwise be safe, so will go ahead and merge and try to backport since it is a critical issue for customers that hit this.

/label acknowledge-critical-fixes-only

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the acknowledge-critical-fixes-only Indicates if the issuer of the label is OK with the policy. label Sep 2, 2025
@yuqi-zhang
Copy link
Contributor

/cherry-pick release-4.20

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@yuqi-zhang: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-4.20 in a new PR and assign it to you.

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.20

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@yuqi-zhang
Copy link
Contributor

/verified later @yuqi-zhang

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added verified-later verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria labels Sep 2, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@yuqi-zhang: This PR has been marked to be verified later by @yuqi-zhang.

In response to this:

/verified later @yuqi-zhang

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@RishabhSaini
Copy link
Contributor Author

/unhold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 3, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 7a56cf0 and 2 for PR HEAD c2c1b70 in total

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 0634552 into openshift:main Sep 3, 2025
16 of 22 checks passed
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@RishabhSaini: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-56558: Some pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

The following pull request, linked via external tracker, has not merged:

All associated pull requests must be merged or unlinked from the Jira bug in order for it to move to the next state. Once unlinked, request a bug refresh with /jira refresh.

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-56558 has not been moved to the MODIFIED state.

This PR is marked as verified-later. Jira issue(s) in the title of this PR will require post-merge verification. After testing, it must be manually moved to the VERIFIED state.

In response to this:

- What I did
crc & kcc: Before deleting a degraded MC, ensure that the annotations have not been updated since the last check

- How to verify it
Check OCPBUGS-56558

- Description for the changelog

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@yuqi-zhang: new pull request created: #5273

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.20

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
acknowledge-critical-fixes-only Indicates if the issuer of the label is OK with the policy. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/severity-important Referenced Jira bug's severity is important for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria verified-later
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants