Skip to content

Conversation

@sairameshv
Copy link
Member

@sairameshv sairameshv commented Nov 26, 2025

Manual backport of #5399

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Nov 26, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 26, 2025

@sairameshv: This pull request references OCPNODE-3883 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target either version "4.20." or "openshift-4.20.", but it targets "openshift-4.21" instead.

Details

In response to this:

Manual cherry-pick of #5399

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 26, 2025

@sairameshv: This pull request references OCPNODE-3883 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target either version "4.20." or "openshift-4.20.", but it targets "openshift-4.21" instead.

Details

In response to this:

Manual backport of #5399

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Copy link
Member

@isabella-janssen isabella-janssen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve
/label backport-risk-assessed

This looks like a fair change to me as the OCP docs do indicate that a cluster with cgroup v1 cannot upgrade to 4.19, which makes the removed block of code unnecessary, and is a clean backport.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. label Nov 26, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 26, 2025
@QiWang19
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 26, 2025
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Dec 4, 2025
clusters

- Option of configuring cgroupv1 has been removed in OCP - 4.19
- It is safe to remove this check from the operator status for all the clusters greater than OCP - 4.19
- Also removed the cluster fleet evaluation that checks if a cluster is
  configured with cgroupv1

Signed-off-by: Sai Ramesh Vanka <[email protected]>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 6, 2026
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jan 6, 2026
@sairameshv sairameshv changed the title [release-4.20] OCPNODE-3883: Remove the dead code of setting the operator status for cgroupv1 based clusters [release-4.20] OCPBUGS-70349: Remove the dead code of setting the operator status for cgroupv1 based clusters Jan 6, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@sairameshv: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-70349, which is valid.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.20.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.20.z)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note type set to "Release Note Not Required"
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-70350 is in the state Closed (Done), which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-70350 targets the "4.21.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.21.0
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @lyman9966

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Manual backport of #5399

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Jan 6, 2026
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from lyman9966 January 6, 2026 10:46
Copy link
Member

@isabella-janssen isabella-janssen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

Looks like a clean backport.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 6, 2026
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 6, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: isabella-janssen, QiWang19, sairameshv

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@sairameshv
Copy link
Member Author

/verified by @sairameshv

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Jan 6, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@sairameshv: This PR has been marked as verified by @sairameshv.

Details

In response to this:

/verified by @sairameshv

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 6, 2026

@sairameshv: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/bootstrap-unit 704f74a link false /test bootstrap-unit

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit bf69ce3 into openshift:release-4.20 Jan 6, 2026
14 of 15 checks passed
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@sairameshv: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-70349: Some pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

The following pull request, linked via external tracker, has not merged:

All associated pull requests must be merged or unlinked from the Jira bug in order for it to move to the next state. Once unlinked, request a bug refresh with /jira refresh.

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-70349 has not been moved to the MODIFIED state.

This PR is marked as verified. If the remaining PRs listed above are marked as verified before merging, the issue will automatically be moved to VERIFIED after all of the changes from the PRs are available in an accepted nightly payload.

Details

In response to this:

Manual backport of #5399

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.