Skip to content

[OSDOCS#18502]: Modularization for 4.17.51 to 4.17.41 release notes#108827

Open
bjahagir-OpenShift wants to merge 1 commit intoopenshift:enterprise-4.17from
bjahagir-OpenShift:bjahagir-4.17-zstream-relnotes-modularization-41-50
Open

[OSDOCS#18502]: Modularization for 4.17.51 to 4.17.41 release notes#108827
bjahagir-OpenShift wants to merge 1 commit intoopenshift:enterprise-4.17from
bjahagir-OpenShift:bjahagir-4.17-zstream-relnotes-modularization-41-50

Conversation

@bjahagir-OpenShift
Copy link
Contributor

@bjahagir-OpenShift bjahagir-OpenShift commented Mar 21, 2026

Version(s):
4.17

Issue:
https://redhat.atlassian.net/browse/OSDOCS-18502

Link to docs preview:
https://108827--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/release_notes/ocp-4-17-release-notes.html#ocp-4-17-asynchronous-errata-updates_release-notes

QE review:
N/A

Additional information:
This PR covers files for versions 4.17.41 to 4.17.51 only.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. label Mar 21, 2026
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 21, 2026

@bjahagir-OpenShift: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@bjahagir-OpenShift
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label merge-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR label Mar 21, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants