Update log6x-audit-log-filtering.adoc

[amandverma]

Updated line 48 to 51, as inputRefs and filterRefs are accepting array type of value.

clf.spec.pipeline.inputRefs|outputRefs|filterRefs should of array type instead of string.

Version(s):

4.14 - 4.18

Issue:

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OBSDOCS-970

Link to docs preview:

https://93743--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/
https://93743--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/observability/logging/logging-6.1/log6x-clf-6.1.html
https://93743--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/observability/logging/logging-6.2/log6x-clf-6.2.html

QE review:

• QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

[ocpdocs-previewbot]

🤖 Mon May 26 16:34:16 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:

https://93743--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/
https://93743--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/observability/logging/logging-6.1/log6x-clf-6.1.html
https://93743--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/observability/logging/logging-6.2/log6x-clf-6.2.html

[openshift-ci]

@amandverma: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[amandverma]

/label peer-review-needed

[mletalie]

/label peer-review-in-progress

[mletalie]

/label peer-review-done
/remove-label peer-review-needed
/remove-label peer-review-in-progress
/lgtm

[mletalie]

Hello @amandverma,
Overall, looks good to me, but from what I can tell, your changes don't reflect the exact ask in the ticket, from what I can tell. I may be interpreting this incorrectly, but wanted to mention. Thanks.

[openshift-bot]

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

[amandverma]

/label merge-review-needed

[jab-rh]

@amandverma, does this not go into 4.20? If so, it cannot go into main either.

[lahinson]

Hi @amandverma - Be sure to note whether QE has approved this PR before you add it to the merge review queue. Thanks!