Skip to content

Conversation

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

This is an automated cherry-pick of #3378

/assign mansikulkarni96

Prevents client.Do from blocking indefinitely.
When a job fails a wall of text is dumped in the test job logs,
including the full job spec as well as all events associated with it.
This hasn't proven to be useful for debugging, and makes the errors
harder to read.

All of this information can be found elsewhere in the artifact
directory.
@mansikulkarni96
Copy link
Member

/approve
/lgtm

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 1, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mansikulkarni96, openshift-cherrypick-robot

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. labels Oct 1, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD a3765cc and 2 for PR HEAD 67af946 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD ce80213 and 1 for PR HEAD 67af946 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD aa95c72 and 0 for PR HEAD 67af946 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/hold

Revision 67af946 was retested 3 times: holding

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Oct 2, 2025
@sebsoto
Copy link
Contributor

sebsoto commented Oct 9, 2025

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Oct 9, 2025
@sebsoto
Copy link
Contributor

sebsoto commented Oct 9, 2025

/override ci/prow/azure-e2e-upgrade ci/prow/nutanix-e2e-operator

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 9, 2025

@sebsoto: Overrode contexts on behalf of sebsoto: ci/prow/azure-e2e-upgrade, ci/prow/nutanix-e2e-operator

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/azure-e2e-upgrade ci/prow/nutanix-e2e-operator

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 2c7a080 and 2 for PR HEAD 67af946 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD f664abd and 1 for PR HEAD 67af946 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 0215b71 and 0 for PR HEAD 67af946 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/hold

Revision 67af946 was retested 3 times: holding

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Oct 16, 2025
@jrvaldes
Copy link
Contributor

/override ci/prow/azure-e2e-upgrade

@jrvaldes
Copy link
Contributor

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Oct 23, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 23, 2025

@jrvaldes: Overrode contexts on behalf of jrvaldes: ci/prow/azure-e2e-upgrade

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/azure-e2e-upgrade

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 3556d8e and 2 for PR HEAD 67af946 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 96c0fa3 and 1 for PR HEAD 67af946 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD f9274eb and 0 for PR HEAD 67af946 in total

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 25, 2025

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/nutanix-e2e-operator 67af946 link true /test nutanix-e2e-operator

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/hold

Revision 67af946 was retested 3 times: holding

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Oct 25, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants