Skip to content

Conversation

@sebsoto
Copy link
Contributor

@sebsoto sebsoto commented Jan 8, 2026

No description provided.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jan 8, 2026
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 8, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sebsoto

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 8, 2026
@mansikulkarni96
Copy link
Member

@sebsoto I recommend creating openshift/containerd branch release-4.22 from tag v2.2.1 as part of this branching task.

@sebsoto sebsoto changed the title [WIP] 4.22 branching - do not merge WINC-1542: 4.22 branching Jan 9, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Jan 9, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Jan 9, 2026

@sebsoto: This pull request references WINC-1542 which is a valid jira issue.

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jan 9, 2026
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jan 11, 2026
Update to openshift/ovn-kubernetes@904d66a

This commit was generated using hack/update_submodules.sh
Update to openshift/kubernetes@581cfc7

This commit was generated using hack/update_submodules.sh
This commit was generated using hack/update_submodules.sh
This commit was generated using hack/update_submodules.sh
Update to openshift/cloud-provider-azure@8584b9a

This commit was generated using hack/update_submodules.sh
@sebsoto sebsoto force-pushed the master-submodule-update-01-08 branch from 74ab38d to 2afa98c Compare January 12, 2026 14:12
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jan 12, 2026
@sebsoto
Copy link
Contributor Author

sebsoto commented Jan 12, 2026

@sebsoto I recommend creating openshift/containerd branch release-4.22 from tag v2.2.1 as part of this branching task.

@mansikulkarni96 that would be combining two different changes in this PR so I would like to avoid that. Once this PR merges and we have a working release-4.22 build I will be happy to set the containerd release-4.22 branch to v2.

@mansikulkarni96
Copy link
Member

@sebsoto do we want to start building images using the 4.22 golang image or we want to make that change when doing the kube bump?

@sebsoto
Copy link
Contributor Author

sebsoto commented Jan 12, 2026

/retest-required

@sebsoto
Copy link
Contributor Author

sebsoto commented Jan 12, 2026

do we want to start building images using the 4.22 golang image or we want to make that change when doing the kube bump?

@mansikulkarni96 I'd say we do the latter, to prioritize a working build.

@mansikulkarni96
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 12, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 3178596 and 2 for PR HEAD 2afa98c in total

@sebsoto
Copy link
Contributor Author

sebsoto commented Jan 12, 2026

/override ci/prow/nutanix-e2e-operator ci/prow/aws-e2e-operator

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 12, 2026

@sebsoto: Overrode contexts on behalf of sebsoto: ci/prow/aws-e2e-operator, ci/prow/nutanix-e2e-operator

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/nutanix-e2e-operator ci/prow/aws-e2e-operator

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@sebsoto
Copy link
Contributor Author

sebsoto commented Jan 12, 2026

/override "Red Hat Konflux / windows-machine-config-operator-release-4-22-ec / pr group" "Red Hat Konflux / windows-machine-config-operator-release-4-22-ec / windows-machine-config-operator-bundle-release-4-22" "Red Hat Konflux / windows-machine-config-operator-release-4-22-ec / windows-machine-config-operator-release-4-22"

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 12, 2026

@sebsoto: Overrode contexts on behalf of sebsoto: Red Hat Konflux / windows-machine-config-operator-release-4-22-ec / pr group, Red Hat Konflux / windows-machine-config-operator-release-4-22-ec / windows-machine-config-operator-bundle-release-4-22, Red Hat Konflux / windows-machine-config-operator-release-4-22-ec / windows-machine-config-operator-release-4-22

Details

In response to this:

/override "Red Hat Konflux / windows-machine-config-operator-release-4-22-ec / pr group" "Red Hat Konflux / windows-machine-config-operator-release-4-22-ec / windows-machine-config-operator-bundle-release-4-22" "Red Hat Konflux / windows-machine-config-operator-release-4-22-ec / windows-machine-config-operator-release-4-22"

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@sebsoto
Copy link
Contributor Author

sebsoto commented Jan 12, 2026

/override ci/prow/vsphere-proxy-e2e-operator ci/prow/nutanix-e2e-operator

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 12, 2026

@sebsoto: Overrode contexts on behalf of sebsoto: ci/prow/nutanix-e2e-operator, ci/prow/vsphere-proxy-e2e-operator

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/vsphere-proxy-e2e-operator ci/prow/nutanix-e2e-operator

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 12, 2026

@sebsoto: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit b7ce666 into openshift:master Jan 12, 2026
21 of 24 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants