-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 139
Skip watcher containers for downstream #2515
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -55,3 +55,12 @@ cifmw_build_containers_install_from_source: false | |
| # cifmw_build_containers_dockerfile_labels | ||
| # cifmw_build_containers_extra_config | ||
| # cifmw_build_containers_build_timeout | ||
|
|
||
| # Note(Chandankumar): Remove it once watcher related packages are available downstream. | ||
| cifmw_build_containers_exclude_containers: | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. cifmw_build_containers_exclude_containers is documented in the README as a list but in fact it's a nested dictionary.
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Good finding, I will update this pull request to address this change and remove watcher skip from here. thank you! |
||
| rhos18: | ||
| rhel9: | ||
| - watcher-base | ||
| - watcher-api | ||
| - watcher-applier | ||
| - watcher-decision-engine | ||
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Rather than defining this temporary list in the role defaults, can it be set in the job variables of the D/S job that calls the role.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you @lewisdenny for the review, I have proposed a mr downstream to achieve the same.