Skip to content

Conversation

eugenioenko
Copy link
Contributor

Motivation
We want to provide great documentation for OpenTDF. Currently we have WebSDK documentation automatically generated via TypeDoc and hosted here but they are not linked in the readme and hard to discover

PR Changes

  • Adds a link to the typedoc docs in the readme.md

@eugenioenko eugenioenko requested a review from a team as a code owner September 11, 2025 15:25
Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @eugenioenko, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request aims to enhance the user experience by making the existing OpenTDF Web SDK documentation more accessible. The primary change involves updating the project's main README file to include a prominent link to the comprehensive TypeDoc-generated documentation, ensuring that users can easily find and utilize the available resources.

Highlights

  • Documentation Discoverability: A direct link to the OpenTDF Web SDK documentation (generated via TypeDoc) has been added to the README.md file to improve its discoverability.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request successfully adds a documentation link to the README.md, which improves discoverability. The accompanying formatting changes throughout the file also enhance readability and maintain a consistent style. I've noted one minor typo in the documentation text that should be corrected.

@eugenioenko eugenioenko force-pushed the feat/DSPX-1665-link-docs branch from 6201339 to b85fa35 Compare September 11, 2025 15:26
Copy link

@eugenioenko eugenioenko merged commit 3efcbe1 into main Sep 11, 2025
17 checks passed
@eugenioenko eugenioenko deleted the feat/DSPX-1665-link-docs branch September 11, 2025 16:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants