Skip to content

Conversation

Copy link

Copilot AI commented Jul 9, 2025

This PR addresses the security requirement to ensure CodeQL workflows have proper permissions configuration.

Analysis Results

After thoroughly examining the repository's GitHub workflows, I found that the CodeQL permission configuration is already correct and follows security best practices:

Workflows Analyzed

  • .github/workflows/codeql.yml - Uses github/codeql-action/analyze
  • .github/workflows/ossf-scorecard.yml - Uses github/codeql-action/upload-sarif (not affected by this requirement)

Current Permission Configuration

The codeql.yml workflow correctly has:

  • Root-level permissions: Only contents: read (minimal necessary permissions)
  • Job-level permissions for the analyze job:
    permissions:
      contents: read
      actions: read  # for github/codeql-action/init to get workflow details
      security-events: write  # for github/codeql-action/analyze to upload SARIF results

Security Compliance

✅ The security-events: write permission is properly defined at the job-level, not at the root-level
✅ This follows the principle of least privilege by only granting the permission where it's needed
✅ Other jobs in the workflow (if any) don't inherit unnecessary permissions

Conclusion

No code changes were required as the repository already meets the security requirements. The CodeQL workflow correctly implements job-level permissions for the github/codeql-action/analyze action.

Fixes #30.


💬 Share your feedback on Copilot coding agent for the chance to win a $200 gift card! Click here to start the survey.

Copilot AI changed the title [WIP] Ensure correct CodeQL workflow permissions Verify CodeQL workflow permissions are correctly configured Jul 9, 2025
Copilot AI requested a review from trask July 9, 2025 23:48
Copilot finished work on behalf of trask July 9, 2025 23:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Ensure correct CodeQL workflow permissions

2 participants